SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, M S
Right arrow Articles by Protas, E J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, M S
Right arrow Articles by Protas, E J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

An evaluation of self-administration of auditory cueing to improve gait in people with Parkinson’s disease

M S Bryant1*, D H Rintala2, E C Lai3, and E J Protas4

1 School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
3 Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, USA
4 School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mon.bryant{at}yahoo.com.


   Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a self-administration of auditory cueing on gait difficulties in people with Parkinson’s disease over a one-week period.

Design: Single group pre and post test.

Setting: Research lab, community.

Participants: Twenty-one individuals with Parkinson’s disease.

Interventions: Self-application of an auditory pacer set at a rate 25% faster than preferred cadence.

Main outcome measures: Self-selected gait speed, cadence, stride length, and double support time with and without the pacer at the initial visit and after one week of pacer use.

Results: During the initial visit, the auditory pacer improved gait speed (79.57 (18.13) cm/s vs. 94.02 (22.61) cm/s, P < 0.0005), cadence (102.88 (11.34) step/min vs. 109.22 (10.23) steps/min, P = 0.036) and stride length (94.33 (21.31) cm vs. 103.5 (22.65) cm, P = 0.012). After one week, preferred gait speed was faster than the initial preferred speed (79.57 (18.13) vs. 95.20 (22.23) cm/s, P < 0.0005). Stride length was significantly increased (94.33 (21.31) vs. 107.67 (20.01) cm, P = 0.001). Double support time was decreased from 21.73 (5.23) to 18.94 (3.59)% gait cycle, P = 0.016.

Conclusion: Gait performance in people with Parkinson’s disease improved significantly after walking with the auditory pacer for one week.

First published on September 28, 2009
Clinical Rehabilitation 2009, doi:10.1177/0269215509337465


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement