SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jelles, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bouter, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jelles, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bouter, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

conference

Staff satisfaction with team conferences: development of a questionnaire

F. Jelles

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit

Cam van Bennekom

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit

GJ Lankhorst

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit

LM Bouter

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

The Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) is part of RAP-TEAM which is a novel method for structuring multidisciplinary team conferences. As such, RAP-TEAM is intended to facilitate interdisciplinary team work in rehabilitation medicine. Before the effects of RAP-TEAM in team conferences can be studied, an assessment method had to be chosen. A questionnaire was considered the most appropriate. The present study describes the develop ment of this questionnaire and its psychometric evaluation. Questions were drafted from three sources: literature, team conference observations, and discussion with professionals from various disciplines. Questions were divided among five dimensions: (1) problem analysis, (2) planning intervention, (3) evaluation, (4) organization, and (5) common viewpoint. For psychometric evaluation the questionnaire was completed by 39 professionals of various rehabilitation disciplines. After analysis of homogeneity (values of Cronbach's alpha range from 0.70 to 0.84), the predesigned dimension structure of the questionnaire was studied. The predesigned dimension structure could not be confirmed. Only one new dimension appears to be present which is post hoc defined as 'a professional's satisfaction with team conferences'. Homogeneity of this singular dimension is 0.92. Face and content validity of questions were established during construction of the questionnaire. Response to the ques tionnaire was not biased by social desirability. It is concluded that the ques tionnaire can be used to study the effects of RAP-TEAM.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 47-55 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559601000110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Pryor
Co-ordination of patient care in inpatient rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 341 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E. E Roelofsen, G. J Lankhorst, and L. M Bouter
Translation and adaptation of a questionnaire to assess the group processes of rehabilitation team conferences
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2001; 15(2): 148 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement