Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, P. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, P. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Stroke rehabilitation in the elderly: analysis of six years' experience

Paul J Friedman

Stroke Unit, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand

Objective: To evaluate changes to a system consisting of a stroke unit and a stroke registry to follow elderly stroke subjects from admission until six months poststroke.

Methods: The inputs, outputs and outcomes of stroke for all persons aged 60 and above were measured over six years (1987-92).

Results: An average of 212 persons with acute stroke were registered each year. Demographic features of stroke subjects did not change appreciably during the six-year study period. Indices of stroke severity and case fatality remained similar. Hospital length of stay, however, fell by 45% from 1987 to 1992 (p <0.0001) without any decline in functional outcome, as measured by Barthel ADL scores at discharge or maximal recovery and discharge residence. The percentage of subjects transferred to the stroke unit rose from 43% in 1987 to 64% in 1992. The stroke unit operated with minimal selection.

Conclusions: Stroke units using minimal selection criteria warrant further study as an alternative to more highly selective stroke units.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 56-62 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559601000111


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement