This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Novak, S. Articles by Greenwood, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Novak, S. Articles by Greenwood, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Barthel revisited: making guidelines work

Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital, London

Julia Johnson

Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital, London

Richard Greenwood

Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital, London

The Barthel Index (Bl) is a weighted and summed index designed to reflect a patient's dependency on carers. The aims of this study were first, to establish the validity of the Bl in a patient group whose disability resulted from cognitive as well as physical impairment, a combination frequently encountered in patients with brain injuries other than simple stroke. Secondly, a way was desired of using the Bl which, in a rehabilitation unit with both experienced and inexperienced staff, was less contentious and thus reliable. It was found that issuing guidelines along with the standard definitions did not wholly achieve this end. Instead, through discussions as a multidisciplinary team, scoring definitions were evolved which, although including the original definitions, were more comprehensive and specifically addressed those areas which had hitherto been contentious in respect of the patient group. As a measure of validity the amount of carer time each patient required in a 24- hour period was recorded and correlated against the Bl score. Preliminary data demonstrate that the Bl, in this form, retains validity and inter-rater reliability when used with patients after brain injuries of all sorts.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 2, 128-134 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559601000208


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Houlden, M. Edwards, J. McNeil, and R. Greenwood Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2006; 20(2): 153 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Liu, J. E McNeil, and R. Greenwood Rehabilitation outcomes after brain injury: disability measures or goal achievement? Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2004; 18(4): 398 - 404. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Hocking, M. Williams, J. Broad, and J. Baskett Sensitivity of Shah, Vanclay and Cooper's modified Barthel Index Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1999; 13(2): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]