SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wiles, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wiles, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The effectiveness of occupational therapy and physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis patients with ataxia of the upper limb and trunk

L. Jones

Occupational Therapy Services

Y. Lewis

Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Square

J. Harrison

Department of Occupational, Queen Square Therapy — Directorate of Neurorehabilitation and Therapy Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

CM Wiles

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and the Institute of Neurology, Queen Square London

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of therapy intervention in reducing impairment and disability due to upper limb and trunk ataxia in chronic multiple sclerosis (MS).

Design: The change in performance scores of two patient groups - an inpatient group who received two weeks' therapy intervention and an outpatient 'control' group awaiting a similar admission - were compared.

Subjects: Thirty-seven (out of a total of 62) patients with clinically definite or laboratory-supported definite MS, with ataxia of the upper limbs and/or trunk, and who had stable or slowly progressive disease.

Intervention: The (inpatient) treatment group (n = 28) received eight half-hour sessions each of occupational therapy and physiotherapy over eight consecutive working days. Treatment approaches used were aimed at improving dynamic posture and appropriate adaptation of the environment. The control group (n = 9) received no intervention.

Assessments: Patients were assessed the day before therapy began and the day after it ended: the control group were assessed at the same (two-week) interval. Assessments used included the Jebsen Test of Hand Function (JTHF), the Kurtzke Functional Systems Scale (FSS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the Northwick Park Index of activities of daily living (NPI), and patient and assessor visual analogue scales. Assessors were independent of patient treatment.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups at entry to the study with respect to age, sex and scores on the FSS (exception bowel function). The NPI scores were not significantly different except for walking and feeding, whereas the control group was slightly better (Mann-Whitney U-test; p = 0.048; p = 0.037).

No significant difference between the change scores of the two groups was found on the JTHF and FSS neurological scores. The treatment group showed significant improvement compared to controls in the NPI scores and on the self and assessor visual analogue scales.

Conclusion: The findings support the clinical impression that therapy used to improve dynamic posture and methods of performing functional tasks can result in improvement of functional ability in patients with MS where spontaneous improvement would not otherwise be expected.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 4, 277-282 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559601000403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. Martin, D. Tan, P. Bragge, and A. Bialocerkowski
Effectiveness of physiotherapy for adults with cerebellar dysfunction: a systematic review
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 15 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J Craig, C A Young, M Ennis, G Baker, and M Boggild
A randomised controlled trial comparing rehabilitation against standard therapy in multiple sclerosis patients receiving intravenous steroid treatment
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2003; 74(9): 1225 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. K. Ko
Effectiveness of rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1999; 13(1_suppl): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S E Lord, D T Wade, and P W Halligan
A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 1998; 12(6): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D T WADE
Services for patients with multiple sclerosis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 1997; 63(3): 275 - 278.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement