SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Barthel Index: an ordinal score or interval level measure?

Alan Tennant

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK

Joanna ML Geddes

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit University of Leeds, Leeds

M Anne Chamberlain

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit University of Leeds, Leeds

The Barthel Index is one of the most widely used activities of daily living (ADL) measures in stroke rehabilitation and there has been some debate recently about whether or not the Index is an ordinal score or an interval level measure. An audit of 192 consecutive patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation following stroke has provided the opportunity to examine this question with recently developed mathematical techniques based on the work of George Rasch. Rasch models define the criteria which data must follow to produce an interval level measure. It thus becomes possible to test the data derived from the audit against the Rasch model.

Calibration of the 10 items in the Index shows considerable differences in the degree of difficulty (weight), and these differences are not compensated for by the current scoring. Thus adding together the items produces a scale whose intervals vary considerably, particularly between intervals at the lower or upper ends of the scale, and those at the centre. This can give rise to considerable differences between the change score based on the Rasch transformation (taking into account item difficulty) and the change score based on raw scores. These findings confirm the ordinal nature of the Barthel Index. Further questions are raised about the unidimensionality of the Index, and the context in which it should be used.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 4, 301-308 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559601000407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. O.C. Leung, C. C.H. Chan, and S. Shah
Development of a Chinese version of the Modified Barthel Index validity and reliability
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 912 - 922.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. van Hartingsveld, C. Lucas, G. Kwakkel, and R. Lindeboom
Improved Interpretation of Stroke Trial Results Using Empirical Barthel Item Weights
Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 162 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
I-P. Hsueh, W.-C. Wang, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh
Rasch Analysis of Combining Two Indices to Assess Comprehensive ADL Function in Stroke Patients
Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 721 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
PROGRESS
Effects of a Perindopril-Based Blood Pressure-Lowering Regimen on Disability and Dependency in 6105 Patients With Cerebrovascular Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2333 - 2338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P.W. Duncan, S.M. Lai, R.K. Bode, S. Perera, and J. DeRosa
Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function
Neurology, January 28, 2003; 60(2): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Bennett and N. Ryall
Using the modified Barthel index to estimate survival in cancer patients in hospice: observational study
BMJ, December 2, 2000; 321(7273): 1381 - 1382.
[Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. Hocking, M. Williams, J. Broad, and J. Baskett
Sensitivity of Shah, Vanclay and Cooper's modified Barthel Index
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1999; 13(2): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement