This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Marolf, M. Articles by Prosiegel, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Marolf, M. Articles by Prosiegel, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis patients: a comparative study of the Functional Independence Measure, the Extended Barthel Index and the Expanded Disability Status Scale

St Gallische Rehabilitationsklinik Walenstadtberg, Switzerland — Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Medical Centre, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

C. Vaney

Bernische Höhenklinik Montana Switzerland

N. König

Marianne Strauss Klinik, Berg, Germany

T. Schenk

Neurologisches Krankenhaus, Munich

M. Prosiegel

Neurologisches Krankenhaus, Munich

This study was conducted to compare the Extended Barthel Index (EBI) to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as a measure used to assess changes in a patient's need for help with activities of daily living. One hundred patients with multiple sclerosis were evaluated by the same person upon arrival in a rehabilitation clinic and four weeks later. EBI and FIM both proved to be far more sensitive in detecting changes than the EDSS (29% of patients changed their EBI score, 32% their FIM score, 5% their EDSS score). EBI and FIM showed a very high correlation (Spearman correlation coefficient r_s = 0.9705). Both scales correlated somewhat less with the EDSS (r_s = -0.7624, resp. -0.7611). Considering the high correlation and equal sensitivity of EBI and FIM, the study recommends the use of the EBI, since it has a simpler rating system and the elimination of some redundant FIM items increases user-friendliness and compliance.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 4, 309-313 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559601000408


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, H. C. W. de Vet, G. J. Lankhorst, C. H. Polman, and L. M. Bouter The usefulness of evaluative outcome measures in patients with multiple sclerosis Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2648 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Jansa, T. Pogacnik, and P. Gompertz An Evaluation of the Extended Barthel Index with Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2004; 18(1): 37 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Jorger, S. Beer, and J. Kesselring Impact of Neurorehabilitation on Disability in Patients with Acutely and Chronically Disabling Diseases of the Nervous System Measured by the Extended Barthel Index Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 15 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hobart, J. Freeman, and A. Thompson Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition Brain, May 1, 2000; 123(5): 1027 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]