This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dvir, Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dvir, Z. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Grade 4 in manual muscle testing: the problem with submaximal strength assessment

Department of Physical Therapy, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel

Objective: To compare the static moment of force required for a muscle group to support a limb segment against gravity with the maximal dynamic moment it can generate.

Design: Based on anthropometric measures of both sexes and theoretical calculations, the estimated anti-gravity static muscular moments (MGM) at the shoulder, elbow, hip and knee joints were compared with published data relating to the isokinetic strength (MIM) of the same muscle groups.

Results: The ratio of static to dynamic moment, MGM/MIM, was drastically higher in muscles operating on the proximal compared with the more distal joints. In women, the values of this ratio in the shoulder, hip, elbow and knee muscles were 7-27%, 5-65%, 7% and 5-10% respectively. The corresponding figures in men were 7-21 %, 4-44%, 8-10% and 5-8%. The ratios relating to the abductors, flexors and extensors of the hip joint were substantially higher in women than in men.

Conclusions: Since MGM and MIM correspond to grades 3 and 5 in manual muscle testing, the findings of this theoretical analysis indicate that elbow and knee muscles assessed as having grade 4 may generate as low as 10% of their maximal strength. With regard to shoulder and hip muscles the corresponding values are typically around 20% and 30-40%. Coupled with the very limited human precision in sensing of force, these findings indicate that where quantitative targets in muscle strength conditioning are set or when an accurate measure of impairment is being sought, grade 4 cannot and should not serve as a valid criterion.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 1, 36-41 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Selles, B.T.J. van Ginneken, T. A.R. Schreuders, W. G.M. Janssen, and H. J. Stam Dynamometry of intrinsic hand muscles in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Neurology, December 12, 2006; 67(11): 2022 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W Bohannon Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2005; 19(6): 662 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hochstenbach, K. P. van Spaendonck, A. R Cools, M. W. Horstink, and T. Mulder Cognitive deficits following stroke in the basal ganglia Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 1998; 12(6): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [PDF]