|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in nonacute stroke patients
SA Adams
University Rehabilitation Research Unit, Southampton
RM Pickering
University of Southampton, Medical Statistics and Computing
A. Ashburn
University Rehabilitation Research Unit, Southampton
NB Lincoln
Stroke Research Unit, City Hospital Nottingham
Objective: To examine the scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) with nonacute stroke patients in the community.
Design: This was a prospective study of the patients after discharge from hospital. All subjects were assessed on the RMA at six and 12 months after discharge home from hospital. Coefficients of scalability and reproducibility were calculated for each of the three sections of the RMA at each assessment.
Subjects: Subjects were nonacute stroke patients aged 65 years and over, nonacute stroke patients aged under 65 years, and a selected group of those aged under 65 years.
Results: Only the items in the gross function section met scaling criteria with nonacute strokes in both age groups, which suggests that the items in this section were in appropriate order of difficulty. The items in the leg and trunk section were not in hierarchical order and were in fact closer to scaling if the present order were reversed.
Conclusions: The clinical and research value of the RMA, as an ordered scale, are questioned. Changes in treatment styles and philosophies may mean that some of the items themselves are out-dated.
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 1,
52-59 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100108

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mayr, M. Kofler, E. Quirbach, H. Matzak, K. Frohlich, and L. Saltuari
Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2007;
21(4):
307 - 314.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, A. Van de Winckel, and W. De Weerdt
Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2007;
21(5):
387 - 394.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Van de Winckel, H. Feys, N. Lincoln, and W. De Weerdt
Assessment of arm function in stroke patients: Rivermead Motor Assessment arm section revised with Rasch analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2007;
21(5):
471 - 479.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Wenzelburger, F. Kopper, A. Frenzel, H. Stolze, S. Klebe, A. Brossmann, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, M. Golge, M. Illert, and G. Deuschl
Hand coordination following capsular stroke
Brain,
January 1, 2005;
128(1):
64 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schauer and K.-H. Mauritz
Musical motor feedback (MMF) in walking hemiparetic stroke patients: randomized trials of gait improvement
Clinical Rehabilitation,
July 1, 2003;
17(7):
713 - 722.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Franchignoni, L. Tesio, E. Benevoloand, and M. Ottonello
Psychometric properties of the Rivermead Mobility Index in Italian stroke rehabilitation inpatients
Clinical Rehabilitation,
March 1, 2003;
17(3):
273 - 282.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Adams, A. Ashburn, R. Pickering, and D. Taylor
The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in acute stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation,
February 1, 1997;
11(1):
42 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|