SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in nonacute stroke patients

SA Adams

University Rehabilitation Research Unit, Southampton

RM Pickering

University of Southampton, Medical Statistics and Computing

A. Ashburn

University Rehabilitation Research Unit, Southampton

NB Lincoln

Stroke Research Unit, City Hospital Nottingham

Objective: To examine the scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) with nonacute stroke patients in the community.

Design: This was a prospective study of the patients after discharge from hospital. All subjects were assessed on the RMA at six and 12 months after discharge home from hospital. Coefficients of scalability and reproducibility were calculated for each of the three sections of the RMA at each assessment.

Subjects: Subjects were nonacute stroke patients aged 65 years and over, nonacute stroke patients aged under 65 years, and a selected group of those aged under 65 years.

Results: Only the items in the gross function section met scaling criteria with nonacute strokes in both age groups, which suggests that the items in this section were in appropriate order of difficulty. The items in the leg and trunk section were not in hierarchical order and were in fact closer to scaling if the present order were reversed.

Conclusions: The clinical and research value of the RMA, as an ordered scale, are questioned. Changes in treatment styles and philosophies may mean that some of the items themselves are out-dated.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 1, 52-59 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. Mayr, M. Kofler, E. Quirbach, H. Matzak, K. Frohlich, and L. Saltuari
Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, A. Van de Winckel, and W. De Weerdt
Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2007; 21(5): 387 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Van de Winckel, H. Feys, N. Lincoln, and W. De Weerdt
Assessment of arm function in stroke patients: Rivermead Motor Assessment arm section revised with Rasch analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2007; 21(5): 471 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Wenzelburger, F. Kopper, A. Frenzel, H. Stolze, S. Klebe, A. Brossmann, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, M. Golge, M. Illert, and G. Deuschl
Hand coordination following capsular stroke
Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 64 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Schauer and K.-H. Mauritz
Musical motor feedback (MMF) in walking hemiparetic stroke patients: randomized trials of gait improvement
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 713 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
F. Franchignoni, L. Tesio, E. Benevoloand, and M. Ottonello
Psychometric properties of the Rivermead Mobility Index in Italian stroke rehabilitation inpatients
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 273 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Adams, A. Ashburn, R. Pickering, and D. Taylor
The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in acute stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1997; 11(1): 42 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement