This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ellis, B. Articles by Goddard, J. R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ellis, B. Articles by Goddard, J. R Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Joint angle measurement: a comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand

School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University of Southampton, Southampton

Anne Bruton

School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University of Southampton, Southampton

Jonathan R Goddard

Medical Statistics and Computing, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton

Objectives: To compare the inter- and intra-rater reliability of goniometry and wire tracing in the assessment of finger joint angles: metacarpo-phalangeal (MCPJ), proximal (PIPJ) and distal interphalangeal joints (DIPJ).

Design: Twenty occupational therapists and 20 physiotherapists with a range of clinical experience were recruited from nine different centres. Using a masked goniometer and wire tracing they carried out repeated assessments of the MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ of a normal subject fixed in two different positions.

Results: The two assessment methods did not produce comparable angle measurements. Goniometry showed greater inter- and intra-rater reliability than wire tracing. Regardless of the assessment tool, the repeatability coefficient indicated that DIPJ measurement was less reliable than the other joints. Clinical and specialist experience did not affect reliability.

Conclusion: Although both goniometry and wire tracing show limitations as reliable assessment tools, it is recommended that where possible goniometry should be used.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 314-320 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100408


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. MOLLER, C. SOLLERMAN, M. GEIJER, P. KOPYLOV, and M. TAGIL Avanta Versus Swanson Silicone Implants in the MCP Joint--A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of 30 Patients Followed for 2 Years J Hand Surg Eur Vol., February 1, 2005; 30(1): 8 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Adams, J Burridge, M Mullee, A Hammond, and C Cooper Correlation between upper limb functional ability and structural hand impairment in an early rheumatoid population Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2004; 18(4): 405 - 413. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. ROSE, C. C. NDUKA, J. A. PEREIRA, M. A. PICKFORD, and H. J. C. R. BELCHER Visual Estimation of Finger Angles: Do we Need Goniometers? J Hand Surg Eur Vol., August 1, 2002; 27(4): 382 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Ellis and A. Bruton A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2002; 16(5): 562 - 570. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. GEORGEU, S. MAYFIELD, and A. M. LOGAN Lateral Digital Photography with Computeraided Goniometry versus Standard Goniometry for Recording Finger Joint Angles J Hand Surg Eur Vol., April 1, 2002; 27(2): 184 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]