Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sainsbury, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sainsbury, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 321-328 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100409

Assessing and restoring function in elderly people — more than rehabilitation

TJ Wilkinson

Department of Health Care of the Elderly, Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

DC Buhrkuhl

Department of Health Care of the Elderly, Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

R. Sainsbury

Department of Health Care of the Elderly, Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

Objective: To quantify the medical component of assessing and restoring function in the elderly and to determine if a subset who did not require medical input could be identified.

Design: Prospective consecutive sample.

Setting: Inpatient assessment, treatment and rehabilitation unit for the elderly in New Zealand.

Patients: Two hundred patients aged 60-98 years.

Main outcome measures: (1) Proportion of elderly people receiving rehabilitation who also required treatment of medical problems. (2) Characteristics of those not requiring medical input.

Results: One hundred and seventy-two (86%) of people required some medical input during their hospital stay for rehabilitation. Forty-nine per cent had medical conditions which had a direct impact on their rehabilitation. Rehabilitation was delayed for a mean 16.8 (13.0-20.6)% of hospital stay when significant medical problems required treatment. People with previously undiagnosed conditions affecting rehabilitation tended to be older. The referral diagnoses most likely to result in an uncomplicated inpatient stay (i.e. rehabilitation only or rehabilitation with treatment of minor medical problems) were postsurgical treatment (55% uncomplicated), stroke (47% uncomplicated) or amputation (55% uncomplicated). However, 45-53% of people with these problems had a major medical component to their stay. People with other referral diagnoses or those admitted from institutions for the elderly were more likely to have a medical component to their stay.

Conclusion: Restoration of function in the elderly requires a combination of both medical and rehabilitation skills. Reliable predictors of those not requiring medical input could not be found.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?