Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prosser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Canby, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prosser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Canby, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Further validation of the Elderly Mobility Scale for measurement of mobility of hospitalized elderly people

Linda Prosser

Physiotherapy Department, Bristol General Hospital, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol

Anne Canby

Physiotherapy Department, Bristol General Hospital, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol

Objective: To further assess the validity and inter-rater reliability of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS). Also whether the scale reflects elderly people's perceptions regarding their mobility, and whether it can predict discharge destination, or likelihood of falling.

Design: Questionnaire-based study completed on admission and weekly after this on all patients referred to physiotherapy for mobility problems over the course of one month.

Setting: Care of the elderly wards in the Bristol General Hospital.

Subjects: Sixty-six patients (ages 66-69 years, 66% female) were included in the validity study. Nineteen patients (ages 71-95 years, 47% female) were included in the inter-rater reliability study.

Interventions: EMS, Barthel and patients' perceptions of mobility were tested with routine physiotherapy treatment carried out as necessary.

Main outcome measures: Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating EMS scores with Barthel scores using Spearman's test. Inter-rater reliability was also tested using a Spearman's correlation. EMS scores of patients were also evaluated in conjunction with whether or not they fell and their destination on discharge.

Results: A significant correlation between EMS and Barthel scores indicated concurrent validity. Inter-rater reliability was demonstrated on 19 patients with a significant correlation between scores. No predictive validity could be ascribed to EMS in terms of discharge destination or likelihood of falling. Results do indicate a possible predictive validity of the functional reach component of the EMS regarding the risk of future falls.

Conclusions: The EMS was found to be a valid scale with good inter-rater reliability that could be readily applied during daily clinical work. However, it was found to have no predictive validity in terms of falling or discharge destination.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, No. 4, 338-343 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. F.W. Ng, R. K.Y. Tong, and L. S.W. Li
A Pilot Study of Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial of Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients With Partial Body-Weight Support Electromechanical Gait Trainer and Functional Electrical Stimulation: Six-Month Follow-Up
Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. S. W. Yu, C. C. H. Chan, and R. K. M. Tsim
Usefulness of the Elderly Mobility Scale for classifying residential placements
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2007; 21(12): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
T. P. Haines, K. Hill, W. Walsh, and R. Osborne
Design-Related Bias in Hospital Fall Risk Screening Tool Predictive Accuracy Evaluations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2007; 62(6): 664 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
V. Scott, K. Votova, A. Scanlan, and J. Close
Multifactorial and functional mobility assessment tools for fall risk among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings
Age Ageing, March 1, 2007; 36(2): 130 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Linder, L. Winkvist, L. Nilsson, and N. Sernert
Evaluation of the Swedish version of the Modified Elderly Mobility Scale (Swe M-EMS) in patients with acute stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2006; 20(7): 584 - 597.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E. G Spilg, B. J Martin, S. L Mitchell, and T. C Aitchison
Falls risk following discharge from a geriatric day hospital
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 334 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E. G Spilg, B. J Martin, S. L Mitchell, and T. C Aitchison
A comparison of mobility assessments in a geriatric day hospital
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2001; 15(3): 296 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement