This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Herk, I. E. Articles by Rispens, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Herk, I. E. Articles by Rispens, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ten-metre walk, with or without a turn?

Northern Centre for Health Care Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

J Hans Arendzen

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Piet Rispens

Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Objective: To compare results obtained using different procedures to measure 10-metre walking time.

Design: Walking was timed over a straight 10 m, and over 5 m with return. Further, the time taken to turn was measured directly.

Setting: Rehabilitation department of a university hospital.

Subjects: Patients who had walking disability after stroke.

Results: In the group of 43 patients, the time taken to walk 5 m and return was 3.3 (SD 5.0) s longer than the time to walk 10 m straight, but there was a large variation with some patients walking faster. The measured time to turn in a second group of 27 patients was 3.2 (SD 1.6) s. The times taken to walk 10 m straight and 5 m and return, and the time taken to turn were all highly correlated (r = 0.69 or more).

Conclusions: Timing walking over 5 m with a return is an acceptable alternative to the 10 m straight walk, but the actual time taken varies. On average, the walk with a turn is 3.2 s longer but in individual patients the difference may be much more or less. Sometimes the walk with a turn is even faster than that without.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 30-35 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921598667081596


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K Gottberg, U Einarsson, S Fredrikson, L von Koch, and L W Holmqvist A population-based study of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis in Stockholm county: association with functioning and sense of coherence J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 60 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U Einarsson, K Gottberg, L von Koch, S Fredrikson, C Ytterberg, Y P Jin, M Andersson, and L W. Holmqvist Cognitive and motor function in people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2006; 12(3): 340 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Park, A. R. White, M. A. James, A. G. Hemsley, P. Johnson, J. Chambers, and E. Ernst Acupuncture for Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Sham-Controlled, Subject- and Assessor-Blind, Randomized Trial Arch Intern Med, September 26, 2005; 165(17): 2026 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A B. Deathe and W. C Miller The L Test of Functional Mobility: Measurement Properties of a Modified Version of the Timed "Up & Go" Test Designed for People With Lower-Limb Amputations Physical Therapy, July 1, 2005; 85(7): 626 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Green, A. Forster, and J. Young Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2002; 16(3): 306 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G Hatfield Beyond the 10-m time: A pilot study of timed walks in lower limb amputees Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 210 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]