SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Novak, S A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Novak, S A
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Assistive Devices
*Disabilities
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Environmental control systems – an audit of existing provision in three inner London districts

S A Novak

Locum Consultant in Rehabilitation Medicine, King's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Objective: To undertake an audit of existing environmental control system (ECS) provision to see what lessons could be applied to developing a new model of service.

Design: Structured interviews and assessments making use of questionnaires and algorithms.

Subjects: Users of environmental control systems in the inner London boroughs of Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham (population 720 000) supplied with equipment prior to April 1996 out of National Health Service funds.

Setting: All users were assessed and interviewed in their own homes.

Results: In all, 29 users of ECSs were surveyed. Six users were found to have systems either so outdated or poorly planned as to be nearly useless. Seven users were felt not to justify an ECS and many systems were felt to be over specified, leading to wastage of equipment. Many medical and nonmedical needs, not directly related to the users' ECSs, were identified.

Conclusions: While the recommendations of the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine special interest group on ECS are welcomed, it is thought that these do not go far enough. In particular the role of the environmental control assessor needs to extend to participation in the case conference where the exact equipment requirements of the prescribed ECS is agreed, and thereafter to include responsibility for ensuring regular review of users. In such a model of service the current single payment for a one-off assessment is felt to be inappropriate.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 88-93 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921598671164157


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S M Maguire, J P McCann, and M Swallow
An audit of the provision of environmental control systems in Northern Ireland, 1992-1997
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2001; 15(3): 320 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement