Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lord, S E
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lord, S E
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 2, 107-119 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921598666182531

Visual gait analysis: the development of a clinical assessment and scale

S E Lord

P W Halligan

D T Wade

Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, UK

Objectives: To develop and evaluate a four-point scale visual gait assessment form, the Rivermead Visual Gait Assessment (RVGA), for clinical use with patients with neurological deficits.

Design: Preliminary clinical testing of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.

Setting: Patients were recruited from the Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre (RRC), a centre specializing in rehabilitation for patients with neurological disease.

Patients: Ten inpatients were assessed by up to seven physiotherapists for the main reliability study, and eight different patients were also assessed by two raters one week apart. Twenty outpatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were receiving physiotherapy to improve their mobility and 27 inpatients with various neurological conditions were also assessed and the data used to examine validity, reliability and sensitivity to change.

Outcome: The other comparative measures used were walking time, stride length, step length asymmetry, balance and the Rivermead Mobility Index.

Results: Inter-rater reliability between multiple raters was reasonable both for the global scores from the gait assessment form (Kendall's coefficient of concordance; p <0.001), and for individual items (complete agreement occurred on 63.8% of all observations). There was a significant correlation between the global RVGA score and the various criterion measures (r = 0.53–0.79; p <0.001) and between change in the RVGA score and change in walking time in patients who received treatment (r = 0.68; p <0.01).

Conclusions: The RVGA provides the clinician with a clinical assessment of the quality of gait which may be used in conjunction with other measures to inform and monitor the value of physiotherapy treatment for people with MS and stroke, and possibly other neurological deficits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. V. Vaz, R. d. C. Schettino, T. R. Rolla de Castro, V. R. Teixeira, S. R. Cavalcanti Furtado, and E. de Mello Figueiredo
Treadmill training for ataxic patients: a single-subject experimental design
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 234 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Mehrholz, K. Rutte, and M. Pohl
Jump training is feasible for nearly ambulatory patients after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2006; 20(5): 406 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. E. Lord and L. Rochester
Measurement of Community Ambulation After Stroke: Current Status and Future Developments
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1457 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
O.R. Pearson, M.E. Busse, R.W.M. van Deursen, and C.M. Wiles
Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders
QJM, August 1, 2004; 97(8): 463 - 475.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C M Wiles, R G Newcombe, K J Fuller, A Jones, and M Price
Use of videotape to assess mobility in a controlled randomized crossover trial of physiotherapy in chronic multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 256 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
F. Franchignoni, L. Tesio, E. Benevoloand, and M. Ottonello
Psychometric properties of the Rivermead Mobility Index in Italian stroke rehabilitation inpatients
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 273 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. L McGinley, P. A Goldie, K. M Greenwood, and S. J Olney
Accuracy and Reliability of Observational Gait Analysis Data: Judgments of Push-off in Gait After Stroke
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2003; 83(2): 146 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. A Forlander and R. W Bohannon
Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1999; 13(2): 97 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S E Lord, D T Wade, and P W Halligan
A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 1998; 12(6): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [PDF]