SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rae, S A
Right arrow Articles by Penney, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rae, S A
Right arrow Articles by Penney, C
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Back Pain
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Designing a Back Management Service: the Exeter experience and first year results

S A Rae

J Blood Smyth

M Ivens

C Penney

Royal Devon and Exeter Healthcare NHS Trust, Exeter, UK

Background: The recent British Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on back pain highlighted the importance of primary care in the active management of acute back pain and, at the same time, recommended the establishment of rehabilitation services for those with subacute and chronic back pain.

Objective: To describe a new Back Management Service (BMS) in Exeter and to review the first year's results.

Methods: Analysis of observational data collected from the clinic and therapy database.

Assessments: Clinic outcome assessed by diagnostic and referral patterns as well as by general practitioner questionnaire. The Back Management Programme was assessed by Short Form 36 (SF36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HAD) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results: In the first year 297 patients were seen in the clinic; clinic triage resulted in confirmation of primary care diagnosis in 235 (79%) of patients, with diagnosis revised in 62 (21%). One hundred and eighty-nine (63.6%) patients were referred for therapy. Of these, 54 were referred for one-to-one therapy and 135 were referred for multidisciplinary review with 29 patients subsequently recruited into the Back Management Programme for rehabilitation. Two out of three outcome measures were significantly improved at the end of the 36-hour, four-week course.

Conclusions: A Back Management Service can provide useful diagnostic reassessment of patients with chronic low back pain, and can focus therapeutic effort for the effective management of their pain.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 4, 354-361 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921598677686891


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement