SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyson, S F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyson, S F
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The support taken through walking aids during hemiplegic gait

S F Tyson

Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Department of Health Studies, Brunel University, Isleworth, Middlesex, UK

Objective: To assess the effect of different aids on the amount of support hemiplegic subjects took from them. The relationship between the amount of support, severity of hemiplegia and walking ability were also assessed.

Design: Hemiplegic subjects' gait and the amount of support they took from the aid were measured as they walked with a normal height stick, a high stick and a tripod.

Subjects: Fifteen subjects with a hemiplegia of more than three months' duration who could walk independently were recruited.

Outcome measures: Velocity, the gross function section of the Rivermead Motor Assessment, percentage bodyweight taken through the aid, the aid contact time, the placement of the aid, and the lateral shift of the pelvis when weight bearing were assessed.

Results: No differences in the amount of support or walking ability were found with the different aids. There was a significant relationship between severity of hemiplegia and the percentage of bodyweight taken through the aid (r = –0.67), between aid contact time and severity of hemiplegia (–0.53) and between aid contact time and walking ability (–0.53). No relationship between walking ability and other measures of the amount of support was found.

Conclusions: Different types of aid did not influence the amount of support taken by hemiplegic subjects. These results contradict the beliefs of many neurological physiotherapists in Britain and the clinical implications are discussed.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 5, 395-401 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921598669871795


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
Y. Laufer
Effects of one-point and four-point canes on balance and weight distribution in patients with hemiparesis
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 141 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. F Tyson
Trunk kinematics in hemiplegic gait and the effect of walking aids
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1999; 13(4): 295 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement