This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bussmann, J B. Articles by Stam, H J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bussmann, J B. Articles by Stam, H J Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach

Institute of Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

H J Stam

Institute of Rehabilitation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Objective: Mobility is an important construct in rehabilitation; many instruments have emerged which measure or assess (aspects of) mobility. In the selection or development of an appropriate technique, knowledge about the fundamentals of rehabilitation medicine is needed, as well as about essential characteristics of techniques and fundamental differences between them. The aim of this paper is to classify, assess and discuss current techniques which are or can be used to measure aspects of mobility.

Design: Eight techniques (physical science techniques, clinimetry, observation, diaries, questionnaires, actigraphy, physiological techniques and activity monitors) are classified, assessed and discussed, based on the level of outcome measures, the aspect of mobility they measure, and methodological and practical criteria.

Results and conclusions: Rehabilitation medicine has a particular need for instruments that enable measurement of outcome measures on the level of activity and role fulfilment. Techniques differ in the type and number of mobility aspects they measure. Furthermore, important differences exist based on methodological and practical criteria. One optimal technique does not exist: the choice of a technique always depends on a complexity of factors, such as clinical problem, research questions, the mobility aspect of interest, required methodological strength, costs and availability.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Culhane, M. O'Connor, D. Lyons, and G. M. Lyons Accelerometers in rehabilitation medicine for older adults Age Ageing, November 1, 2005; 34(6): 556 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O.R. Pearson, M.E. Busse, R.W.M. van Deursen, and C.M. Wiles Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders QJM, August 1, 2004; 97(8): 463 - 475. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M E Busse, O R Pearson, R Van Deursen, and C M Wiles Quantified measurement of activity provides insight into motor function and recovery in neurological disease J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 75(6): 884 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. J. Kilkens, M. W. Post, A. J Dallmeijer, H. A. Seelen, and L. H. van der Woude Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2003; 17(4): 418 - 430. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Franchignoni, L. Tesio, E. Benevoloand, and M. Ottonello Psychometric properties of the Rivermead Mobility Index in Italian stroke rehabilitation inpatients Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 273 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]