Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stilwell, P.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stilwell, P.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Traumatic Brain Injury
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: the Community Outcome Scale

Philippa Stilwell

John Stilwell

Carol Hawley

Carol Davies

Centre for Health Services Studies (CHESS), University of Warwick, UK

Objective: To develop a way of measuring long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) that takes account of individual circumstances.

Design: Reports by head-injured people and their families about problems and coping strategies were elicited via semi-structured interviews. Specially designed computer software was used to record problems and strengths and to measure their impact for the individual on four handicap dimensions.

Setting: Interviews took place in the respondents' homes.

Subjects: Between 1992 and 1997 the services at 10 rehabilitation centres in England were evaluated. Subjects were men and women aged between 16 and 65 who had suffered TBI and who had been referred for treatment to one of the centres under study.

Interventions: Head-injured people and their families were interviewed three months, 18 months and in some cases 36 months after recruitment.

Main outcome measures: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and the Functional Independence/Assessment Measure (FIM/FAM) were used to validate relevant dimensions of the new scale.

Results: A measure of long-term outcome was developed and called the Community Outcome Scale. Relevant dimensions of the scale showed significant correlation with the HAD and with items of the FIM/FAM.

Conclusion: The scale captures information which no other instrument does, and merits further validation.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 6, 521-531 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921598673761855


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J Powell, J Heslin, and R Greenwood
Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2002; 72(2): 193 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
N Bent, A Jones, I Molloy, M A Chamberlain, and A Tennant
Factors determining participation in young adults with a physical disability: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2001; 15(5): 552 - 561.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement