SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winward, C. E
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winward, C. E
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D. T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke

Charlotte E Winward

Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, UK

Peter W Halligan

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Derick T Wade

Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, UK

Objective: To examine the perceived clinical relevance, current practice and knowledge of somatosensory testing in three professional groups involved in the management and rehabilitation of stroke.

Design: Structured postal questionnaire sent to therapists and doctors. Subjects: One hundred and eighty occupational therapists from the National Association of Neurological Occupational Therapists (NANOT), 180 physiotherapists from the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists with an Interest in Neurology (ACPIN) and 360 doctors from the Association of British Neurologists (ABN) and the British Geriatrics Society (BSG).

Setting: Hospitals and rehabilitation centres in the UK.

Results: Replies were obtained from 84 occupational therapists (47%), 98 physiotherapists (55%) and 78 doctors (22%). Sixty-four occupational therapists (77%), 82 physiotherapists (84%) and 66 doctors (87%) indicated that they routinely performed somatosensory assessment as part of their clinical assessment. The two most commonly used measures were proprioception and light touch. Seventy-eight occupational therapists (93%), 88 physiotherapists (90%) and 67 doctors (91%) regarded sensory assessment as clinically significant in determining prognosis after stroke.

Conclusions: Despite published reservations concerning its usefulness and reliability, most therapists and doctors routinely assess somatosensory loss after stroke. All three professions agreed that somatosensory testing presented useful information for prognosis. Furthermore, all professional groups believe somatosensory assessment to be clinically relevant.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 1, 48-55 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921599701532126


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Schabrun and S. Hillier
Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 27 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Connell, N. Lincoln, and K. Radford
Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 758 - 767.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
N. Yozbatiran, B. Donmez, N. Kayak, and O. Bozan
Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for sensory and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 4 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. E Sullivan and L. D Hedman
A Home Program of Sensory and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation With Upper-Limb Task Practice in a Patient 5 Years After a Stroke
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2004; 84(11): 1045 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. K. Sommerfeld and M. H von Arbin
The impact of somatosensory function on activity performance and length of hospital stay in geriatric patients with stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2004; 18(2): 149 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E. Eek and M. Engardt
Assessment of the perceptual threshold of touch (PTT) with high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (Hf/TENS) in elderly patients with stroke: a reliability study
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2003; 17(8): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. M Dannenbaum, S. M Michaelsen, J. Desrosiers, and M. F Levin
Development and validation of two new sensory tests of the hand for patients with stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 630 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. E Winward, P. W Halligan, and D. T Wade
The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2002; 16(5): 523 - 533.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement