Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Psychological correlates of outcome following rehabilitation from stroke

Michael S Clark

Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University of South Australia, Australia, UK

Dennis S Smith

Department of Rehabilitation, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Objectives: To confirm, in a new sample, the value of our previously described procedure for identifying abnormal illness behaviour (AIB) in stroke rehabilitation patients, and to examine the relative effects of AIB, depression, family functioning, knowledge of stroke, and expectations of rehabilitation on long-term rehabilitation outcome.

Design: A longitudinal design, with assessments on admission to and discharge from rehabilitation, and six and twelve months after discharge.

Setting: The study was undertaken in the rehabilitation unit at Repatriation General Hospital, in Adelaide, South Australia.

Subjects: Sixty twelve-month stroke survivors, residing in a family environment, who had undergone an inpatient rehabilitation programme.

Main outcome measures: AIB was assessed using the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire, depression with the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, family functioning with the McMaster Family Assessment Device, stroke knowledge with the Stroke Care Information Test, and expectations of rehabilitation with an open-ended question. Functional outcome was assessed with the competence and performance assessments of the Australian ADL Index, and lifestyle activities with the Frenchay Activities Index.

Results: Using our previously derived AIB classification rule, AIB cases scored poorly on functional, social and psychological indicators. Further, cluster analysis of discharge data replicated the rule for identifying patients with AIB. AIB was a strong predictor of functional competence and performance at rehabilitation discharge and both six and twelve months later, while depression was associated with an inactive lifestyle at both six and twelve months. Greater stroke knowledge and clearer expectations of rehabilitation were associated with better functional outcome at discharge. Family functioning was strongly associated with lifestyle activities and ADL performance at both six and twelve months.

Conclusions: The procedure for identifying AIB in this rehabilitation environment appears to be robust. AIB was a key determinant of long-term functional disability, while depression was associated with poorer social functioning. Family functioning was an important determinant of social activities, and of the activities the patient actually does, rather than those the patient is capable of carrying out. Good stroke knowledge and clear expectations of rehabilitation were important determinants of rehabilitation success, and should be fostered to ensure a good rehabilitation outcome. Psychological factors are crucial in determining long-term outcome after rehabilitation from stroke.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 2, 129-140 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921599673399613


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Mangset, Tor Erling Dahl, R. Forde, and T. B. Wyller
'We're just sick people, nothing else': ... factors contributing to elderly stroke patients' satisfaction with rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 825 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
R. D. Goodwin and D. P. Devanand
Stroke, Depression, and Functional Health Outcomes Among Adults in the Community
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, March 1, 2008; 21(1): 41 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
C Donnellan, D Hevey, A Hickey, and D O'Neill
Defining and quantifying coping strategies after stroke: a review.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2006; 77(11): 1208 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman
Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. S Clark, S. Rubenach, and A. Winsor
A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 703 - 712.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Forsberg-Warleby, A. Moller, and C. Blomstrand
Spouses of First-Ever Stroke Patients : Psychological Well-Being in the First Phase After Stroke
Stroke, July 1, 2001; 32(7): 1646 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement