SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mercier, C
Right arrow Articles by Cross, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mercier, C
Right arrow Articles by Cross, P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Description of a new motor re-education programme for the paretic lower limb aimed at improving the mobility of stroke patients

C Mercier

D Bourbonnais

School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Montreal, Canada

S Bilodeau

J F Lemay

P Cross

Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Montreal, Canada

Objective: To describe and examine the feasibility of a new treatment approach for the paretic lower limb and to explore its effectiveness in one chronic hemiparetic stroke subject.

Design: Case report. The treatment was conducted three times per week over a period of six weeks. The mobility of the patient was assessed prior to the treatment, at the end of the treatment and at a six-week follow-up. Settings: The study was carried out at the research centre of the Institut de réadaptation de Montréal. The treating therapist was an experienced rehabilitation professional as was the assessor, who worked at a different rehabilitation centre.

Interventions: The motor re-education programme was based on the use of a static dynamometer that measures the linear external forces produced at the ankle level. A computer program provided the subject with constant feedback on the direction and intensity of the applied force. In each treatment session, the subject was asked to produce several submaximal efforts in 16 specific directions. Both the intensity and the number of repetitions were gradually increased.

Outcome measures: In addition to force production measurements, three clinical assessments of mobility were used: the Timed ‘Up and Go’, the comfortable gait speed and a 2-minute walk test.

Results: The maximal static linear forces produced by the subject increased through the treatment for all directions of effort, but differences were observed amongst directions. During the treatment programme, the subject improved his performance at the three clinical assessments. Even if some of the functional gain was lost at the follow-up, the mobility was still considerably improved as compared to baseline values.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the applicability of the treatment programme to a stroke subject. The results seem very promising and encourage further investigation in order to assess more rigorously the effectiveness of this new approach.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 3, 199-206 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559901300303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
I. Marklund and M. Klassbo
Effects of lower limb intensive mass practice in poststroke patients: single-subject experimental design with long-term follow-up
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2006; 20(7): 568 - 576.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement