Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner-Stokes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Nyein, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner-Stokes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Nyein, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 3, 253-267 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921599677787870
© 1999 SAGE Publications

The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation

Lynne Turner-Stokes

Kyaw Nyein

Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital and Di Halliwell Riverside Community Healthcare Services, London, UK

Background: The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS) has been shown to be valid, reliable and practical to use. It was designed to be used together with a short set of additional questions to inform care needs in the community and facilitate discharge planning.

Aim: To develop a conversion formula to translate information derived from the NPDS into a generic assessment of care needs in the community – the Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA) – and to evaluate its potential as a directly costable measure of outcome in rehabilitation. Setting: An inpatient neurorehabilitation unit for young patients with brain injury.

Method: Part 1, Development: For each task in the NPDS, a set of assumptions was developed to reflect the number of people, the time taken and the frequency of help required. Tasks were collected into a daily timetable and minimum and maximum allocations made for each time slot. From this the weekly care hours can be calculated. A range of care package categories and their approximate costs were identified, and a simple set of criteria developed with experienced community care planners to determine the circumstances under which each category is applied. Part 2, Evaluation: The assumptions and derived care package were evaluated in a prospective comparative study in 35 cases. Timetables of care needs were drawn up using (a) the NPDS-derived Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA) and (b) detailed structured interview with an independent assessor. The weekly hours of care, care package and approximate cost were then determined for each set of timetables, by a third independent assessor, applying the formula described according to strict rules.

Results: Assessment of the total weekly hours of care showed an excellent correlation between the two methods (rho 0.90, p<0.01) with no significant differences. There was also a high correlation in the category of care package allotted and thus the weekly cost of care (rho 0.73, p<0.01).

Conclusion: The NPCNA provides a simple measure of care needs in total care hours, as well as a timetable of care from which a care package can be directly planned and costed. It has potential use, therefore, as an instrument that can demonstrate directly the effectiveness of rehabilitation in reducing the cost of continuing care in the community.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. Williams, R. Harris, and L. Turner-Stokes
Can the Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment be used to estimate nursing staff requirements in an inpatient rehabilitation setting?
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2007; 21(6): 535 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Skinner and L. Turner-Stokes
The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2006; 20(7): 609 - 615.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
L Turner-Stokes, S Paul, and H Williams
Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 77(5): 634 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M W. Post, J M. Visser-Meily, and L S. Gispen
Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 182 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K. Nyein, L. Turner-Stokes, and I. Robinson
The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a measure of community care needs: sensitivity to change during rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 1999; 13(6): 482 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Editorial
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 183 - 185.
[PDF]