This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tyson, S. F Articles by Turner, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tyson, S. F Articles by Turner, G. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The process of stroke rehabilitation: what happens and why

Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Department of Health Studies, Brunel University, Isleworth, Southampton, UK

Gill Turner

Southampton University Hospital Trust, Southampton, UK

Objective: To assess the process of hospital-based stroke rehabilitation.

Design: A criterion-based process audit, combined with surveys of patient and staff opinions and basic outcome measures.

Setting: All wards and units treating stroke patients in a health care district, including an acute and a community National Health Service (NHS) trust.

Subjects: Process audit: documented notes of 115 stroke patients admitted over a four-month period. Patient satisfaction survey: 93 surviving stroke patients. Staff opinion survey: Hospital doctors, therapists and nurses treating stroke patients throughout the district.

Results: A disappointingly poor level of service. The main shortcomings were poor assessment of impairment (pass rate, 46%), inadequate communication between staff and with patients and carers (pass rate, 43%), and an absence of rehabilitation beyond the basic of activities of daily living and indoor mobility (pass rate for assessment of disability and emotional need, 50%). Thirty-three per cent of patients were dissatisfied with the hospital-based service they received, particularly lack of therapy, information and recovery. The main reasons for these shortcomings were low priority given to stroke patients, lack of time, shortage of staff, and lack of knowledge and awareness of stroke amongst the staff. Rehabilitation units and elderly care tended to perform better than general medical units in areas of assessment of impairment, self-care skills and mobility, and wheelchair provision.

Conclusions: Evidence from previous publications suggests that this service was no worse than in other districts, but this audit methodology, by comprehensively examining many aspects of a service together, is better able to reveal inadequacies.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Howell, C. Graham, A Hoffman, D Lowe, C. McKevitt, R. Reeves, and A G Rudd Comparison of patients' assessments of the quality of stroke care with audit findings Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Morris, O. Payne, and A. Lambert Patient, carer and staff experience of a hospital-based stroke service Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. Duncan, R. D. Horner, D. M. Reker, G. P. Samsa, H. Hoenig, B. Hamilton, B. J. LaClair, T. K. Dudley, and M. Kelly-Hayes Adherence to Postacute Rehabilitation Guidelines Is Associated With Functional Recovery in Stroke * Editorial Comment Stroke, January 1, 2002; 33(1): 167 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]