This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rudkin, A. Articles by Rowe, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rudkin, A. Articles by Rowe, D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Disabilities Learning Disorders Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A systematic review of the evidence base for lifestyle planning in adults with learning disabilities: implications for other disabled populations

Dermot Rowe

Slade House, Oxford, UK

Objective: To carry out the first systematic review of the evidence base for lifestyle planning (LP) approaches in adults with learning disability/developmental disorder and to discuss implications for other handicapped/disabled groups.

Method: Exhaustive review of relevant electronic databases, supplemented by appropriate hand-searching of journals and correspondence with key researchers. We gathered information from any papers reporting clear outcome measures. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of relevant studies are appraised.

Results: There are no randomized controlled trials of lifestyle planning in adults with learning disability/developmental disorder. There was one controlled trial. Five studies, with a total of 108 subjects clearly identified, report on some outcome data.

Conclusions: There is surprisingly little evidence to support any form of lifestyle planning or lifestyle planning in general in the learning disability population. No statistically significant findings on positive outcomes with good statistical power exist. Limited data are presented to suggest certain desirable features of some methods of lifestyle planning in terms of process or outcome. However, there may be good ethical reasons for pursuing lifestyle planning with certain patient groups. Suggestions are made as to how further research may add to the evidence base for or against effective outcomes in different forms of lifestyle planning.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 5, 363-372 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921599670705327


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Gustafsson, A. Ojehagen, L. Hansson, M. Sandlund, M. Nystrom, J. Glad, G. Cruce, A.-K. Jonsson, and M. Fredriksson Effects of Psychosocial Interventions for People With Intellectual Disabilities and Mental Health Problems: A Survey of Systematic Reviews Research on Social Work Practice, May 1, 2009; 19(3): 281 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Wigham, J. Robertson, E. Emerson, C. Hatton, J. Elliott, B. McIntosh, P. Swift, E. Krinjen-Kemp, C. Towers, R. Romeo, et al. Reported goal setting and benefits of person centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 2008; 12(2): 143 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Dowling, J. Manthorpe, and S. Cowley Working on person-centred planning: From amber to green light? J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2007; 11(1): 65 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]