Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardol, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Groot, I. J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardol, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Groot, I. J M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA)

Mieke Cardol

Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Rob J de Haan

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Geertrudis A M van den Bos

Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Bareld A de Jong

Imelda J M de Groot

Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Objective: To report on the feasibility and psychometric properties in terms of homogeneity and construct validity of a newly developed handicap questionnaire focusing on person-perceived handicaps: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA).

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting, subjects and outcome measure: One hundred consecutive individuals from the outpatient clinic of the department of rehabilitation of an academic hospital administered the new questionnaire IPA.

Results: The results show good homogeneity and construct validity of the IPA. Factor analysis showed that the scale consists of four factors, explaining 68% of the total variance: social relationships, autonomy in self-care, mobility and leisure, and family role. Homogeneity of the four subscales was considered good, Cronbach's {alpha} ranged from 0.84 (family role) to 0.87 (social relationships). Feasibility in terms of the number of missing values and administration time needed was satisfactory.

Conclusion: The first results suggest that the IPA promises to be a useful handicap questionnaire. Further research is needed to establish test–retest reliability, convergent validity and responsiveness to change.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 5, 411-419 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921599668601325


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
M. V Jelinek
Exercise: the neglected risk factor and the neglected treatment
Heart, March 1, 2009; 95(6): 441 - 441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
H Beckerman, I. van Zee, V de Groot, G. van den Bos, G. Lankhorst, and J Dekker
Utilization of health care by patients with multiple sclerosis is based on professional and patient-defined health needs
Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2008; 14(9): 1269 - 1279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. Dalemans, L. P de Witte, J. Lemmens, W. J. van den Heuvel, and D. T Wade
Measures for rating social participation in people with aphasia: a systematic review
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 542 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Sandstrom and L. Lundin-Olsson
Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation1
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2007; 21(9): 833 - 845.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Lemmens, E. ISM van Engelen, M. W. Post, L. P de Witte, A. Beurskens, P. M. Wolters, and L. P de Witte
Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2007; 21(9): 853 - 862.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
D. Kos, M. Duportail, M. D'hooghe, G. Nagels, and E. Kerckhofs
Multidisciplinary fatigue management programme in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2007; 13(8): 996 - 1003.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A Sibley, P Kersten, C D Ward, B White, R Mehta, and S George
Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2006; 20(9): 793 - 803.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R. Vazirinejad, J. M Lilley, and C. D Ward
The 'Impact on Participation and A utonomy': acceptability of the English version in a multiple sclerosis outpatient setting
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 2003; 9(6): 612 - 615.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Cardol, B. A de Jong, G. A. van den Bos, A. Beelen, I. J M de Groot, and R. J de Haan
Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2002; 16(1): 27 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. T Wade and B. A de Jong
Recent advances: Recent advances in rehabilitation
BMJ, May 20, 2000; 320(7246): 1385 - 1388.
[Full Text]



Advertisement