SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Hara, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Hara, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Multiple Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Delphi study of self-care in a community population of people with multiple sclerosis

Louise O'Hara

Lorraine H De Souza

Lorely Ide

Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Department of Health Studies, Brunel University, London, UK

Objective: The aim of the study was to obtain the views and priorities of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to inform the design of a professionally guided self-care programme.

Design: A three-round postal Delphi survey was used as a research tool.

Setting: The study was conducted at the Centre for Research in Rehabilitation at Brunel University in London.

Subjects: The respondent panel consisted of 200 volunteers with MS of whom 136 responded to the survey (68%). Respondents were recruited through voluntary organizations throughout the UK. The only selection criterion was that the diagnosis of MS was confirmed by the general practitioner.

Main outcome measures: The results from each of the three rounds of the Delphi survey were the outcome measures.

Results: One hundred and one people used ten or more self-care strategies (74%). Round 1 data revealed the diversity of practices reported, crossing many domains of life such as daily chores, leisure, relationships and physical and mental health. The top five priorities identified in rounds 2 and 3 concerned coping strategies, social support, independence in daily living, rest and mobility. Complete consensus about priorities was not achieved. However, agreement about priorities approached stability across rounds 2 and 3 and a highly significant Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated there was good agreement within round 3 group rankings (W = 0.46, chi-squared = 499.37, df = 9, p<0.001, N = 122).

Conclusion: Self-care practices were widespread, and those most commonly used could be identified. This survey method allows the views and priorities of this consumer group to be revealed. The information obtained can be used to develop services where the professional guides and encourages appropriate self-management based upon the issues that people with MS consider to be most important.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 14, No. 1, 62-71 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/026921500666135189


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
D. Kos, M. Duportail, M. D'hooghe, G. Nagels, and E. Kerckhofs
Multidisciplinary fatigue management programme in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial
Multiple Sclerosis, September 1, 2007; 13(8): 996 - 1003.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. Kos, A. I Wertheimer, and A. Mrhar
Satisfaction with Pharmacotherapy for Approved and Off-Label Indications--A Delphi Study
Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2005; 39(4): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
D A Gruenewald, I J Higginson, B Vivat, P Edmonds, and R E Burman
Quality of life measures for the palliative care of people severely affected by multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 690 - 725.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. O'Hara, H. Cadbury, L. De Souza, and L. Ide
Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self-care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: A randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 119 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement