SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goulding, R
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goulding, R
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ealuation of the benefits of monitoring fluid thickness in the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients

R Goulding

Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Southampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK

A MO Bakheit

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

Objective: Safe swallowing may be achieved in most patients with neurogenic dysphagia by manipulating the viscosity of ingested fluids. However, in clinical practice fluids are thickened using subjective judgement. This may lead to errors in the preparation of drinks to the prescribed viscosity. The aim of the present study is to examine whether the use of a viscometer improves the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients.

Study design: A randomized controlled study design was used. The speech and language therapist determined the optimal fluid thickness for each patient. The prescribed fluid viscosity for the study group was obtained using a viscometer. Patients in the control group received fluids prepared according to current practice, i.e. the amount of thickener required to produce the prescribed viscosity was judged subjectively by the nursing staff. The two methods of fluid thickening were used for seven consecutive days. Assessment was made blind to randomization.

Main outcome measure: Pulmonary aspiration, assessed clinically and with pulse oximetry. If the patient did not drink all the fluid that was offered the residue was measured.

Results: Ten patients in the study group (n = 23) and nine in the control group (n = 23) aspirated. The mean viscosity of fluids offered to patients in the control group was significantly higher than that of the study patients. There was a statistically significant correlation between the viscosity and the residual volume of fluid (Pearson's test: r = 0.7, p <0.02). The findings of the study suggest that fluids prepared by subjectively assessing the amount of thickener required to produce a given consistency tend to have a higher viscosity than those prepared using the viscometer. However, the higher viscosity does not appear to protect against pulmonary aspiration and may lead to a reduced fluid intake.

Conclusion: Manipulation of fluid thickness using objective measurements with a viscometer may improve the dietary management of dysphagic stroke patients.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 14, No. 2, 119-124 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/026921500667340586


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
N. Foley, R. Teasell, K. Salter, E. Kruger, and R. Martino
Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Age Ageing, May 1, 2008; 37(3): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Campbell-Taylor, J. Gates, G. G. Hartnell, and G. D. Gramigna
Oropharyngeal Treatment: Some Caveats * Dr Gates and colleagues respond
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 583 - 584.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A M O Bakheit
Management of neurogenic dysphagia
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2001; 77(913): 694 - 699.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement