Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, R. H
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, R. H
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Measuring the outcomes of day hospital attendance: a comparison of the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale

Rowan H Harwood

Shah Ebrahim

University Department of Public Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK

Objective: To assess the ability of two scales to measure the effects of attendance at a geriatric day hospital.

Design: ‘Before-and-after’ measurements. Setting: Day hospital serving a defined, urban, catchment area. Subjects: One hundred and three consecutive new patients over a three-month period.

Intervention: Day hospital attendance for as long as the multidisciplinary team thought warranted.

Outcome measures: Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale. Results: Seventy-six patients (74%) attended for broadly defined ‘rehabilitation’. Measurements on the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale were completed on 54 of these. Repeat measurements after discharge from the day hospital were achieved on 37 patients. Patients attended between two and 57 times, with a median of eight. Mean Barthel Index did not change over the period of attendance. There was a small improvement in mean handicap score. Eight patients were identified post hoc who attended for 10 or more sessions, and they experienced a large mean reduction in handicap.

Conclusion: Overall, neither the Barthel Index nor the London Handicap Scale changed much during attendance at the day hospital. Generally very short lengths of attendance may have explained this. For patients with more prolonged attendance, who might be expected to change more, the London Handicap Scale proved more responsive than the Barthel Index.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 14, No. 5, 527-531 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215500cr346oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
R. S. K. Lo, T. C. Y. Kwok, J. O. Y. Cheng, H. Yang, H. J. Yuan, R. Harwood, and J. Woo
Cross-cultural validation of the London Handicap Scale and comparison of handicap perception between Chinese and UK populations
Age Ageing, September 1, 2007; 36(5): 544 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Hershkovitz, Y. Beloosesky, S. Brill, and D. Gottlieb
Is a day hospital rehabilitation programme associated with reduction of handicap in stroke patients?
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2004; 18(3): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Hershkovitz, D. Gottlieb, Y. Beloosesky, and S. Brill
Programme evaluation of a geriatric rehabilitation day hospital
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 750 - 755.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement