SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, A. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, A. G
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Home Care Services
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation for stroke patients who remain at home: a pilot randomized trial

Charles DA Wolfe

Kate Tilling

Division of Public Health Sciences, London, UK

Anthony G Rudd

Department of Care of the Elderly, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation for stroke patients who were not admitted to hospital in South London.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Patients' homes in South London.

Subjects: Stroke patients not admitted to hospital after a stroke.

Intervention: Rehabilitation at home by rehabilitation team for up to three months or usual care.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Barthel score. Secondary measures included the Motricity Index, Rivermead ADL, Hospital Anxiety and Depression score and Nottingham Health Profile.

Results: Forty-three patients who remained at home were randomized to rehabilitation team (23) or ‘usual’ care (20). The mean number of physiotherapy sessions was three (range 1–14) for the rehabilitation team group and two for the usual care group. Patients (with a deficit) in the rehabilitation arm of the trial were more likely to receive occupational, physical and speech therapy than those in the control arm (p = 0.03, 0.01 and 0.008, respectively). For those patients actually receiving therapy, there was no evidence that the amount received differed between the groups. However, the number of patients in each of these comparisons was very small. The outcome for patients in the rehabilitation team arm of the trial was nonsignificantly higher (0.05 < p < 0.2) than for those in the control arm for the areas of Nottingham Health Profile, anxiety, depression, caregiver strain and the proportion of patients living at home. Based on the data observed here, a trial with approximately 150 patients in each arm would be needed to have adequate power to detect a 33% difference between intervention and control groups in these outcomes.

Conclusion: Community therapy support for patients not admitted to hospital is feasible but to determine whether it is cost- or clinically effective would require trials of adequate size.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 14, No. 6, 563-569 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215500cr362oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
JianJun Yu, YongShan Hu, Y. Wu, WenHua Chen, YuLian Zhu, Xiao Cui, WeiBo Lu, Qi Qi, PeiYu Qu, and XiaoHua Shen
The effects of community-based rehabilitation on stroke patients in China: a single-blind, randomized controlled multicentre trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2009; 23(5): 408 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. Shepperd MSc DPhil, H. Doll MSc DPhil, R. M. Angus MBChB, M. J. Clarke MA DPhil, S. Iliffe BSc MBBS, L. Kalra MD PhD, N. A. Ricauda MD, V. Tibaldi MD PhD, and A. D. Wilson MD
Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 20, 2009; 180(2): 175 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. G. Bani-Hani, D. Greenstein, B. E. Mann, C. J. Green, and R. Motterlini
Modulation of Thrombin-Induced Neuroinflammation in BV-2 Microglia by Carbon Monoxide-Releasing Molecule 3
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2006; 318(3): 1315 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman
Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. M. Geddes and M A. Chamberlain
Home-based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing co-ordinated, multidisciplinary treatment
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2001; 15(6): 589 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement