This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Post, M. W M Articles by Prevo, A. J H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Post, M. W M Articles by Prevo, A. J H Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Adapting the Nottingham Health Profile for use in people with severe physical disabilities

Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht and Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands

Johan Gerritsen

Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat and Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Natascha D M van Leusen

Rehabilitation Centre Breda, Breda, The Netherlands

Marieke A Paping

Rehabilitation Centre Rijndam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Arie J H Prevo

Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat and Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Background: The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) is a well-known quality of life questionnaire. However, wheelchair-bound patients might obtain misleading scores on the scales Physical mobility, Pain and Emotional reactions. We tested three possible adaptations of the Dutch NHP to overcome this problem.

Methods: Respondents were 111 wheelchair-using people (walking ability maximum 5 m) with spinal cord injury, rheumatic diseases and other diagnoses. Adaptation methods were formulation of new questions (Q-NHP), a recoding procedure (R-NHP) and deleting items (D-NHP). Internal consistency, correlations between original and adapted scales and correlations with upper and lower extremity function and social functioning (NHP part II) were computed.

Results: All adapted Pain and Emotional reactions scales were close to the original ones. The original Physical mobility scale proved invalid, resulting in better median scores for those patients who could not walk at all (38.7) than for patients who could walk a bit (50.0). The Q-NHP performed little better than the original one and suffered from greater complexity. The R-NHP showed better internal consistency (0.69 versus 0.49) and construct validity than the D-NHP.

Conclusion: An uncomplicated recoding procedure, scoring five questions about walking problems as ‘yes’ if respondents confirmed the question ‘I cannot walk at all’, improved reliability and validity of the Dutch NHP. Use of this recoding procedure in future research using the NHP is recommended, although its applicability in other language versions has to be proven in future research.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F Boyer, J L Novella, S Bertaud, F Delmer, B Vesselle, and J C Etienne Hereditary neuromuscular disease and multicomposite subjective health status: feasibility, internal consistency and test-retest reliability in the French version of the Nottingham Health Profile, the ISPN Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2005; 19(6): 644 - 653. [Abstract] [PDF]