Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.
Right arrow Articles by Young, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.
Right arrow Articles by Young, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Patterns of hemiparesis recovery in lacunar and partial anterior circulation infarct stroke syndromes

Jane Smith

St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, UK

Sean Brotheridge

Harrogate General Hospital, Harrogate, UK

John Young

St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, UK

Objective: To investigate patterns of hemiparesis recovery in lacunar (LACI) and partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI) stroke syndromes.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: District general hospital and stroke rehabilitation ward.

Subjects: Forty-seven patients (25 LACI and 22 PACI) with a first-ever stroke causing a hemiplegia. Average age 76.4 years (range 59–88).

Measures: Outcome measures assessed disability (Barthel Index), limb power (Motricity Index) and mobility (Rivermead Mobility Index) at baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 24 weeks post stroke onset.

Results: The time to maximum recovery, time to 50% recovery and area under the recovery curve was determined for each of the outcome measures. There were no statistical differences between these recovery parameters between the PACI and LACI stroke syndromes.

Conclusion: Classification of hemiplegic stroke into PACI or LACI syndromes does not distinguish distinctive recovery patterns.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 59-66 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501668563820


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
G. Dixon, E. W Thornton, and C. A Young
Perceptions of self-efficacy and rehabilitation among neurologically disabled adults
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 230 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement