Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, V M
Right arrow Articles by Faragher, E B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, V M
Right arrow Articles by Faragher, E B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 67-83 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501675454995
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Unpacking the black box of nursing and therapy practice for post-stroke shoulder pain: a precursor to evaluation

V M Pomeroy

D S Niven

The Stroke Association's Therapy Research Unit (SATRU), The University of Manchester, UK

S Barrow

The North West Health Research Unit, Manchester Health Authority, UK

E B Faragher

Department of Organisational Health Psychology, UMIST and RC Tallis Department of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Objectives: To describe current nursing and therapy interventions for the prevention and treatment of post-stroke shoulder pain and to explore the extent of their reported use in England.

Design: Semi-structured, themed interviews followed by a postal questionnaire.

Participants: Six nurses, five occupational therapists (OTs) and six physiotherapists (PTs) were interviewed. Twelve nurses, 12 OTs and 12 PTs were sent the pilot questionnaire and the main questionnaire was posted to 332 nurses, 332 OTs and 332 PTs.

Setting: NHS Trusts in England which provide acute stroke care/rehabilitation.

Procedure: Two researchers independently condensed the transcripts of the interviews into a list of interventions which were then transformed into a pilot postal questionnaire. Following the pilot small changes were made. Participants sent the main questionnaire were given three weeks to return it before being posted a reminder. After a further two weeks a researcher gave a telephone reminder.

Results: One hundred and seventy-five different types of interventions were identified. The main questionnaire (57.8% response rate) found that all of the interventions were used by at least one respondent and that only 22.9% of the interventions were used to the same extent by nurses, OTs and PTs. The data also suggest variation in reported use within professions.

Conclusions: This study has found a large number of interventions for post-stroke shoulder pain which are reported to be used. This might reflect different causes of shoulder pain or variation between clinicians. Answers to these questions are expected to guide future evaluative research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. R. Shah, S. Haghpanah, E. P. Elovic, S. R. Flanagan, A. Behnegar, V. Nguyen, S. J. Page, Z.-P. Fang, and J. Chae
MRI Findings in the Painful Poststroke Shoulder
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1808 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Pollock, G. Baer, P. Langhorne, and V. Pomeroy
Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2007; 21(5): 395 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. De Wit, H. Kamsteegt, B. Yadav, G. Verheyden, H. Feys, and W. De Weerdt
Defining the content of individual physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions for stroke patients in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. Development, validation and inter-rater reliability of a scoring list
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2007; 21(5): 450 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
V. M. Pomeroy, E. Cooke, S. Hamilton, A. Whittet, and R. C. Tallis
Development of a Schedule of Current Physiotherapy Treatment Used to Improve Movement Control and Functional Use of the Lower Limb after Stroke: A Precursor to a Clinical Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 350 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Describing rehabilitation interventions
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2005; 19(8): 811 - 818.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Wade
Investigating the effectiveness of rehabilitation professions - a misguided enterprise?
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 1 - 3.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Barriers to rehabilitation research, and overcoming them
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 1 - 4.
[PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S F Tyson and C Chissim
The immediate effect of handling technique on range of movement in the hemiplegic shoulder
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 137 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
Robin Goodfellow
Rheumatology, June 1, 2001; 40(6): 718 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Research into the black box of rehabilitation: the risks of a Type III error
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 1 - 4.
[Abstract] [PDF]