This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rommers, G. M Articles by Eisma, W. H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rommers, G. M Articles by Eisma, W. H Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mobility of people with lower limb amputations: scales and questionnaires: a review

Rehabilitation Centre, Revalidatie Friesland, Beetsterzwaag, The Netherlands

Luc D W Vos

Rehabilitation Centre, Beatrixoord, Haren, The Netherlands

Johan W Groothoff

Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Willem H Eisma

Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Objective and design: A systematic literature review to compare mobility scales used for lower limb amputees. A literature search was carried out by computerized search of biomedical literature including Medline and Embase. The studies included were published between 1978 and 1998 and including the following keywords: amputation, artificial limbs, prosthesis, lower limb, activities of daily living, mobility.

Results: Thirty-five studies were identified; 19 had a measurement of separate levels of mobility comparable to each other. Sixteen studies used ordinal and ratio scales without separate levels of mobility. The widest range of measurement found was the scale from ‘walking with prosthesis without a walking aid’ to ‘totally confined to bed’. The Stanmore Harold Wood mobility scale was published most frequently. None of the 35 studies presented give a continuous measurement of mobility.

Conclusion: A multitude of measurement scales and questionnaires are available for differ in methods and measuring range. Measuring mobility by a scale has been shown to have limitations. Several authors did extensive research but they all measure only a number of aspects of mobility. Consensus about the measurement of mobility of lower limb amputees is not available in the recent literature.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 92-102 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501677990187


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?