Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeulders, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bos, K. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smeulders, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bos, K. E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 2, 133-141 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501672958566
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Fine motor assessment in chronic wrist pain: the role of adapted motor control

Mark JC Smeulders

Michiel Kreulen

Kurt E Bos

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Objective: To show whether a difference in fine motor control exists between patients with chronic, undiagnosed wrist pain (CUWP) and healthy controls. Furthermore, a method to assess fine motor function of the wrist is evaluated.

Design: A case–control study.

Setting: The Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Subjects: Twenty-seven CUWP patients were compared with 50 healthy control subjects.

Interventions: Subjects performed horizontal stroke patterns on a digital writing tablet connected to a computer. The control subjects were tested twice to obtain test–retest reliability. A visual analogue scale was used to assess subjective pain.

Main outcome measures: Fluency of movement and average velocity were measured. Intraclass correlation, ANOVA repeated measures statistics and Pearson correlation were calculated.

Results: There is a significant difference in fluency of motion between patients and controls, possibly due to a disturbed motor control, since there is no relationship between pain and test score, nor do CUWP patients have any abnormality in the wrist that can explain the disturbance in motor function. The test method is reliable (ICC = 0.78) and valid.

Conclusions: The disturbed fine motor control in CUWP patients is suggested to maintain chronic wrist pain through ‘strain injury, causing’ pain evasive adaptation of the motor control system. This might lead to new perspectives regarding treatment of CUWP patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
C. A. WIGDEROWITZ, I. SCOTT, A. JARIWALA, G. P. ARNOLD, and R. J. ABBOUD
Adapting the Fastrak(R) System for Three-Dimensional Measurement of the Motion of the Wrist
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., December 1, 2007; 32(6): 700 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]