This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhakta, B. B Articles by Bamford, J. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bhakta, B. B Articles by Bamford, J. M Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Quantifying associated reactions in the paretic arm in stroke and their relationship to spasticity

University of Leeds, UK

J Alastair Cozens

Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, UK

M Anne Chamberlain

University of Leeds, UK

John M Bamford

St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK

Objectives: (1) To present a measurement protocol for assessing associated reactions (AR) in the paretic arm and (2) to use it to investigate the pattern of AR and its association with spasticity.

Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation unit.

Design: Associated reactions in 49 adults with stroke were measured in terms of force generated, electrical muscle activity and wrist movement in the paretic arm using hand dynamometry, surface electromyography and electrogoniometry respectively. Simultaneous recording of the effort used to elicit the associated reaction was made using a second hand dynamometer. The magnitude and persistence of AR was compared with the clinical assessment of spasticity (using the modified Ashworth Scale, MAS).

Results: There was poor correlation between peak AR and MAS, suggesting that AR are not confined to patients with severe spasticity. Co-activation of forearm flexors and extensors was evident during the AR. AR fluctuated during a single period of effort in some patients. Only 12 out of 31 patients who maintained uniform effort over the measurement period produced a uniform AR. AR often persisted for some time after effort had ceased. Eight were classified as minimal (median AR 0.23 N), 25 as mild (median AR 2.7 N), 11 as moderate (median AR 6.4 N) and 3 as severe (median AR 11.0 N). AR tended to persist in patients with higher MAS although this result was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The magnitude, profile and persistence of AR varied considerably between individuals. Associated reactions were present in people with minimal spasticity. As this technique allows the magnitude of AR to be quantified in relation to effort it has the potential to be a useful outcome measure in clinical trials evaluating the treatments (e.g. physiotherapy) directed at reducing associated reactions.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Raghavan, E. Petra, J. W. Krakauer, and A. M. Gordon Patterns of Impairment in Digit Independence After Subcortical Stroke J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 369 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]