This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Daving, Y. Articles by Grimby, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Daving, Y. Articles by Grimby, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure

Department of Occupational Therapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Eva Andrén

Department of Handicap Research, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Lena Nordholm

Department of Rehabilitation, Division of Health and Caring Science, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Gunnar Grimby

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Objective: To establish the reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

Design: Two raters were present at the same time during the interviews in the home and did independent ratings of the 18 FIM items. The interview procedure was repeated within a week by another two raters in the clinic.

Subjects: Sixty-three stroke survivors (median age 63 years, range 18–71 years) were studied approximately two years after onset.

Raters: Three occupational therapists and one nurse.

Methods: Reliability was calculated as unweighted kappa statistics, percentage agreement (PA), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: Best agreement was found in the motor items of FIM. The kappa statistics showed good to excellent inter-rater values during the same interview except for the Social interaction item. The ICCs based on sum-score for motor (0.92) and social–cognitive items (0.75) respectively, were similar to those reported in the literature. The repeated interview by different raters showed less stable agreement according to kappa values for the items dealing with transfers, locomotion and social–cognition.

Conclusions: FIM assessments showed high inter-rater agreement for the same interview setting (home as well as clinic), but the stability of the measure over time with a repeated interview by different raters was somewhat less satisfactory.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 3, 301-310 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501669986659


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I-P Hsueh, J-H Lin, J-S Jeng, and C-L Hsieh Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2002; 73(2): 188 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]