Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, S M
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, S M
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 3, 320-323 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501671583545
© 2001 SAGE Publications

An audit of the provision of environmental control systems in Northern Ireland, 1992–1997

S M Maguire

J P McCann

Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

M Swallow

Eastern Health and Social Services Board, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

Objective: To evaluate the provision of environmental control systems (ECS) in Northern Ireland with regard to assessment and prescription, installation and review and propose guidelines for future service delivery.

Design: Structured interview, physical examination, Barthel ADL Index, demonstration and assessment of suitability of ECS for patient.

Subjects: Prescriptions for ECS from April 1992 to 1997 were identified from centrally held records. Current users were assessed in their own homes.

Results: Forty-six out of 49 current users identified were assessed. All were severely disabled (Barthel 0–9); 24% were living alone; 7 (15%) were not utilizing the system; 96% were satisfied with their initial assessment. Prior to prescription 52% had information about ECS and 20% had a practical demonstration; 78% felt that this would have been useful; 52% of users were not under routine clinical review; 41% of ECS had been altered since installation. Repairs had taken longer than 7 days in 11% of cases. In 45 cases the ECS was essential and in 43 it was appropriate to the users' needs and abilities.

Conclusions: ECS are a valuable tool for severely disabled persons and are appropriately prescribed in Northern Ireland. A multidisciplinary team should perform assessment and prescription. All patients should have a practical trial of the equipment to assist in prescriptions. Regular review by the team should be performed to identify changes in need and alter systems appropriately. Users who live alone should represent a priority for repairs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?