| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1191/026921501680425216 © 2001 SAGE Publications Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q)
Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH), School of Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH), School of Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology, Martini Hospital Groningen, Harry Crijns Department of Cardiology and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH), School of Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Objective:To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Design: A prospective study of the patients who underwent DC electrical cardioversion. Setting: Clinics of cardiology and thoracic surgery of the University Hospital in Groningen, the Netherlands. Main outcome measures: The disease-specific MLHF-Q and generic measures of quality of life were administered. The sensitivity to change over time was tested with effect sizes (ES). Internal consistency of MLHF-Q scales was estimated with Cronbach's alpha. To evaluate the construct validity multitraitmultimethod analysis was applied. The known group validity was evaluated by the comparison of mean scores and effect sizes between two groups of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (NYHA I versus IIIII). Stability of MLHF-Q scales was estimated in a subgroup of patients who remained stable. Perfect congruence analysis and factor analysis were applied to confirm the a priori determined structure.
Results: Cronbach's alpha was Conclusions: The MLHF-Q has solid psychometric properties and the outcome of the current study indicates that the MLHF-Q is an effective and efficient instrument.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
0.80 of the MLHF-Q scales. Perfect congruence analysis (PCA) showed that the results resemble quite well the a priori assumed factor structure. Multitraitmultimethod analysis showed convergent validity coefficients ranging from 0.59 to 0.73 (physical impairment dimension) and 0.39 to 0.69 (emotional dimension). The magnitude of change can be interpreted as medium (ES = 0.50). The results of a testretest analysis in a stable group can be valued as satisfactory for the MLHF-Q scales (Pearson's r > 0.60). The physical dimension and the overall score of the MLHF-Q discriminated significantly between the NYHA I and IIIII groups (p < 0.001) with large effect sizes (ES > 1.0). 
