This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bent, N Articles by Tennant, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bent, N Articles by Tennant, A Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Factors determining participation in young adults with a physical disability: a pilot study

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK

A Jones

I Molloy

Rehabilitation Medicine Services, North and North East Lincolnshire, UK

M A Chamberlain

A Tennant

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK

Objectives: To evaluate in a pilot study the usefulness of measures of health and psychosocial status for use with young people with physical and complex disability. Also to test empirically a conceptual model of the factors determining key outcomes in young disabled adults, in particular, participation (handicap).

Design: A cross-sectional study involving face-to-face interviews with young adults aged 16–28 years (n = 45) with physical and complex disabilities. A group of nondisabled college students completed the same set of questions to provide normative scores for some psychosocial measures.

Setting: Young people with physical disabilities were recruited from the area of North and North East Lincolnshire, and nondisabled young people from the Leeds area.

Methods: Standardized measures of impairment, disability and handicap, together with various psychosocial scales were incorporated into a structured face-to-face interview. Standardized measures included the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Barthel Index, the London Handicap Scale, Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale and the Proactive Scale.

Results: Regression analysis showed the most important predictors of participation were energy and pain (NHP), disability (Barthel) and self-efficacy. Most of the health status measures were able to discriminate between disabled and nondisabled young people, but some measures lacked face validity for the ‘nonwalking’ disabled group.

Conclusions: Both health status and psychosocial factors were found to impact on the participation of young people. Impairment and disability however, did not impact adversely on self-ratings of health or quality of life and it is clear from these results that having a disability may limit participation, but is not necessarily synonymous with a poorer quality of life.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R M Kent, M A Chamberlain, C Tuffrey, and A Pearce Transition from paediatric to adult neurological services * Authors' reply J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2004; 75(8): 1208 - 1208. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. B Bhakta and M A. Chamberlain Transition from paediatric clinic to the adult service J R Soc Med, January 12, 2001; 94(12): 659 - 659. [Full Text] [PDF]