Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudd, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 5, 562-572 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921501680425289
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Regional variations in stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: results from the National Sentinel Audit of Stroke

Anthony G Rudd

CEEU and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London

P Irwin

Z Rutledge

D Lowe

CEEU, Oxford

D T Wade

Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford

M Pearson

CEEU, Royal College of Physicians of London, London

Study objective: To identify the variations between regions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in the case-mix, organization and process of care for stroke.

Design: Retrospective audit of case notes and service organization.

Setting: Two hundred and ten Trust sites from 197 Trusts in 10 Health Regions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Patients: The 6894 consecutive stroke patients admitted between 1 January and 31 March 1998 (up to 40 per Trust).

Audit tool: The Intercollegiate Stroke Audit.

Results: There are significant differences in stroke care between regions that cannot be explained by known case-mix or clinical variables. The proportion of patients spending more than half their hospital stay in stroke unit care varied between regions from 10% to 27%. Thirty-day mortality in different regions ranged between 21% and 33%. Institutionalization rates for those admitted from home varied between 6% and 19%. Similar variations existed in discharge disability and length of stay.

Conclusions: There were widespread variations in specialist service provision for stroke in different regions. Regional variation in 30-day mortality and in institutionalization after stroke is not explained by clinical factors and therefore may represent different local health care policies and expectations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Sackley, D. T. Wade, D. Mant, J. C. Atkinson, P. Yudkin, K. Cardoso, S. Levin, V. B. Lee, and K. Reel
Cluster Randomized Pilot Controlled Trial of an Occupational Therapy Intervention for Residents With Stroke in UK Care Homes
Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2336 - 2341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. M Sackley, T. J Hoppitt, and K. Cardoso
An investigation into the utility of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire (SADQ) in care home settings
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2006; 20(7): 598 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
P. K. Myint, S. L. Vowler, O. Redmayne, and R. A. Fulcher
Utilisation of diagnostic computerised tomography imaging and immediate clinical outcomes in older people with stroke before and after introduction of the National Service Framework for older people. A comparative study of hospital-based stroke registry data (1997-2003): Norfolk experience.
Age Ageing, July 1, 2006; 35(4): 399 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. Park, A. R. White, M. A. James, A. G. Hemsley, P. Johnson, J. Chambers, and E. Ernst
Acupuncture for Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Sham-Controlled, Subject- and Assessor-Blind, Randomized Trial
Arch Intern Med, September 26, 2005; 165(17): 2026 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. U. Weir, A. Gunkel, M. McDowall, and M. S. Dennis
Study of the Relationship Between Social Deprivation and Outcome After Stroke
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 815 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Bowen, P. Knapp, A. Hoffman, and D. Lowe
Psychological services for people with stroke: compliance with the UK National Clinical Guidelines
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2005; 19(3): 323 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R Portelli, D Lowe, P Irwin, M Pearson, and A. Rudd
Institutionalization after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 97 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C M Roberts, S Barnes, D Lowe, and M G Pearson
Evidence for a link between mortality in acute COPD and hospital type and resources
Thorax, November 1, 2003; 58(11): 947 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Barriers to rehabilitation research, and overcoming them
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 1 - 4.
[PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Rehabilitation is a way of thinking, not a way of doing
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 579 - 581.
[PDF]