SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enderby, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Enderby, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D. T
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Rehabilitation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Community rehabilitation in the United Kingdom

Pam Enderby

Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Sheffield, Community Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield

Derick T Wade

Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, UK

Objective: To investigate the extent and nature of community rehabilitation services within the United Kingdom.

Design: A postal survey starting with the Community Rehabilitation Network and extending to any other teams identified or making contact.

Setting: The National Health Service within the UK.

Subjects: Any team who identified themselves as a community rehabilitation service that worked ‘primarily with adults with physical disability’ within the UK.

Intervention: A questionnaire was sent to each team identified with follow-up telephone contact to clarify answers and/or to encourage replies.

Results: One hundred and fifty-two organizations were sent questionnaires and 145 replied, but 47 were excluded for various reasons leaving 98 valid replies. Four types of team were identified: community rehabilitation teams, young disabled community teams, community teams for older adults, and specific client group teams. There were huge variations in management arrangements, team composition, goals of the services and likely lifespan of the service.

Conclusions: Community rehabilitation in the UK is currently characterized by small, often short-term teams with poor identity and the term has no clear or consistent meaning.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 6, 577-581 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215501cr450oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T. Ryan, P. Enderby, and A. S Rigby
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate intensity of community-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2006; 20(2): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
MS, Parkinson's disease and physiotherapy
DTB, May 1, 2002; 40(5): 38 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement