This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McMillan, T M Articles by Ledder, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McMillan, T M Articles by Ledder, H Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Neurologic Diseases Traumatic Brain Injury Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A survey of services provided by community neurorehabilitation teams in South East England

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow

H Ledder

Wolfson Neurorehabilitation Centre, St George's Healthcare, London

Objective: To survey the role, function and staffing of community rehabilitation teams in London and the South East NHS Region of England who work with neurologically disabled people, with emphasis on services provided for traumatic brain injury.

Design: Telephone survey using a structured interview with team leaders.

Setting: London and South East NHS Regions of England (population 15.6 million).

Subjects: Community rehabilitation teams.

Main outcome measures: A structured interview about service provision.

Results: Thirty-five teams were found in 25 Health Authorities serving 14 million people. In a further five Health Authorities, another five teams did not participate. There were fewer than 1.5 community team professionals for 4000–5000 neurologically disabled. Teams had seen less than 3% of disabled traumatic brain injuries. Most focused on physical disability. Only two teams specialized in consequences of cognitive impairment or personality change. Stroke and multiple sclerosis were the most common referrals. Sixty per cent of teams had no clinical psychologist. The composition of teams is described, as is caseload, clinical role, outcome measures used, professional links, work practice and staffing issues.

Conclusions: Community physical disability teams seem insufficiently resourced to provide a comprehensive service for the neurologically disabled. There are not enough teams generally, and too few specialize in psychosocial problems. All teams should include a clinical psychologist, should have specialist resources for cases from ethnic minorities and formal policies for staff security. There needs to be clarity over the range of services provided and to whom, and this linked to prevalence of disability and team resourcing.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 6, 582-588 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215501cr541oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Fleminger, E. Leigh, and C. McCarthy The size of demand for specialized neuropsychiatry services: rates of referrals to neuropsychiatric services in the South thames region of the United kingdom. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, December 1, 2006; 18(1): 121 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N B Lincoln, M F Walker, A Dixon, and P Knights Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 40 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]

				MS, Parkinson's disease and physiotherapy DTB, May 1, 2002; 40(5): 38 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]