This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Geddes, J. M. Articles by Chamberlain, M A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Geddes, J. M. Articles by Chamberlain, M A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Home-based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing co-ordinated, multidisciplinary treatment

M Anne Chamberlain

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, Research School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK

Objective: To describe and compare six community services providing co-ordinated, multidisciplinary rehabilitation to people with stroke.

Design: Prospective, descriptive, quantitative study.

Setting: England and Northern Ireland.

Subjects: Community rehabilitation teams and the patients treated by them.

Main outcome measures: Annual numbers treated, Barthel Index, mortality, place of discharge, crude costs.

Results: Between mid-1997 and mid-1999, data were collected on 1076 patients who received community-based rehabilitation of whom 48.7% were male. Mean age (SD) was 71 years (13.1); 115 (10.7%) were under 55 years of age and 278 (25.9%) under 65 years of age. Median time between stroke and intervention by the community service was six weeks (25th, 75th percentiles 2.6, 14.4 weeks) and 80.5% had been admitted to hospital. The median Barthel score at the start of community rehabilitation was 15 (11.0, 18.0) and at the end was 18.0 (14.0, 20.0). Median duration of intervention was 12 weeks (6.0, 22.0). At the end of community rehabilitation 912 patients (86.5%) were in the community, 52 (4.9%) had died, 10 (0.9%) were in hospital and 77 (7.3%) in long-term care. Comparative data given here are for one year, 1998, when a total of 519 patients began community rehabilitation. Details of 1855 face-to-face interventions were also recorded from subsets of 10 consecutive patients.

Conclusions: Community rehabilitation teams differed in their target populations, in the timing and duration of intervention. A taxonomy of four types of co-ordinated community-based rehabilitation for people with stroke is proposed: (1) Early-supported discharge rehabilitation aimed to reduce length of hospital stay and offered an alternative to hospital rehabilitation. (2) Post-discharge rehabilitation provided additional rehabilitation and aimed for a seamless transfer of patients from hospital to community. (3) General practitioner-oriented post-stroke rehabilitation provided an alternative to hospital admission and rehabilitation. (4) Late community rehabilitation provided patients with the opportunity of an autonomous service, unconnected with hospital or GP referral. Purchasers need to decide for what purpose a team is to be set up. Researchers need to be similarly aware of diversity in community rehabilitation before comparisons are made.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 6, 589-599 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215501cr452oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				JianJun Yu, YongShan Hu, Y. Wu, WenHua Chen, YuLian Zhu, Xiao Cui, WeiBo Lu, Qi Qi, PeiYu Qu, and XiaoHua Shen The effects of community-based rehabilitation on stroke patients in China: a single-blind, randomized controlled multicentre trial Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2009; 23(5): 408 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S K Baxter and S M Brumfitt Benefits and losses: a qualitative study exploring healthcare staff perceptions of teamworking Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 127 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Wottrich, L. von Koch, and K. Tham The Meaning of Rehabilitation in the Home Environment After Acute Stroke From the Perspective of a Multiprofessional Team Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 778 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ryan, P. Enderby, and A. S Rigby A randomized controlled trial to evaluate intensity of community-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2006; 20(2): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N B Lincoln, M F Walker, A Dixon, and P Knights Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 40 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]