This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, D. Articles by Disler, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, D. Articles by Disler, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Early intervention for acute back injury: can we finally develop an evidence-based approach?

Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medicine, Victoria, Australia

Nancy McMurray

School of Behavioural Science, Melbourne Extended Care and Rehabilitation Service, Victoria, Australia

Peter Disler

Victorian Rehabilitation Research Institute, University of Melbourne and Cedar Court Health South Rehabilitation Hospital and Melbourne Extended Care and Rehabilitation Service, Victoria, Australia

Objective: Several reviews of the treatment of acute low back pain have been published in the past and have formed the basis of clinical guidelines. However, these lack consistency in some areas and valid data in others. As the literature in this field has continued to expand, the present review was undertaken to establish whether the guidelines in current use are supported by more recently published, scientifically rigorous research, and whether additional consensus regarding treatment of acute low back injury has been forthcoming in recent years.

Design: A review, and critical analysis, of literature relating to the treatment of acute low back pain that has been published since the production of the currently used clinical guidelines. The guidelines have been reviewed to assess whether their recommendations remain supportable.

Conclusions: Recent research appears to support current clinical guidelines i.e. exercise may have a positive effect while bed rest is ineffective and may be harmful, simple analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-in‘ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have short-term benefits, and spinal manipulation may be effective in the first four weeks; no evidence was found for traction or back schools. However, we need more randomized controlled trials of treatments shown to be successful with the chronic population, e.g. focused on understanding psychological determinants, and using a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial approach. In the future this may help us to prevent acute low back progressing to the chronic state.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1-11 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr461oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. O'Connor, S. J. Cano, A. J. Thompson, and J. C. Hobart Exploring rating scale responsiveness: Does the total score reflect the sum of its parts? Neurology, May 25, 2004; 62(10): 1842 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]