This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lettinga, A T Articles by Mol, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lettinga, A T Articles by Mol, A Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pitfalls in effectiveness research: a comparative analysis of treatment goals and outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation

K Reynders

T H Mulder

Institute of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen

A Mol

Department of Systematic Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Problem: There is a great diversity of movement therapies in stroke rehabilitation, each of which is treated as a more or less independent system.

Objective: To articulate pitfalls in effectiveness research that has been employed to reduce the number of different forms of treatment.

Methods: The contents of treatment goals and outcome measures in clinical and scienti"c texts on stroke rehabilitation were analysed and contrasted in order to uncover discrepancies.

Issues: The main issue is that theory and conceptualization of therapy play a diminished role in treatment effectiveness research, which may hinder the interpretation of data. The notion that the methodological and statistical tools, if correctly applied, provide researchers with the distance that is thought to be necessary for an objective judgement will be challenged.

Conclusion: The analyses indicate that although scienti"cally credible measurement tools may be neutral with regard to the user, they are not necessarily neutral with regard to the therapies being compared in effectiveness research.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 2, 174-181 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr472oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. T Lettinga, S. van Twillert, B. J. Poels, and K. Postema Distinguishing theories of dysfunction, treatment and care. Reflections on 'Describing rehabilitation interventions' Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2006; 20(5): 369 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]