This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carter, N. D Articles by Wade, D. T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carter, N. D Articles by Wade, D. T Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Delayed discharges from Oxford city hospitals: who and why?

Derick T Wade

Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, UK

Objective: To determine the extent and characteristics of discharge delays of younger patients from acute hospital beds in Oxford, England.

Design: Three-month prospective analysis of patients deemed to have delayed discharge.

Measures: The primary measure was the number of days from the patient being no longer in need of acute medical inpatient care to eventual discharge. Additional assessments included demographic data, primary diagnosis, Motricity Index, Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (SOMC), Barthel Index and contextual data.

Setting: The major acute hospitals serving the county of Oxfordshire (560 000 people).

Subjects: Fifty patients aged 18–70 years identi"ed by referrals, delayed discharge lists and ward visits whose discharge from hospital had been delayed.

Results: The mean (standard deviation, SD) delay period was 36.1 (26.8) days. The mean prevalence and incidence of discharge delays for each three-day period was 19.7 (SD 1.7) and one (SD 1.7) respectively. Most (88%, n = 44) had a primary neurological diagnosis. Twenty-four (48%) patients had Motricity Index scores of less than 50% in one or more limbs and 16 (32%) in two or more limbs. Twenty-six (52%) patients had cognitive impairment (SOMC <18/28). Thirty-nine (78%) patients had a Barthel Index score of less than 15/20 and 24 (48%) of less than 10/20. The period of discharge delay did not correlate with SOMC, Motricity or Barthel Index scores. Only nine had appropriate accommodation available.

Conclusion: Patients whose discharge is delayed were common; most had a neurological disability and cognitive impairment; and accommodation was unsuitable or absent for most. Reorganizing services to give patients access to specialized disability services might both improve the care of these patients and increase the ef"ciency of the health service.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. D Worthington and J B. Oldham Delayed discharge from rehabilitation after brain injury Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 79 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]