This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Oakley, D. A Articles by Halligan, P. W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oakley, D. A Articles by Halligan, P. W Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hypnotic imagery as a treatment for phantom limb pain: two case reports and a review

Department of Psychology, University College London, UK

Lionel Gracey Whitman

Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, University of Cardiff, UK

Peter W Halligan

School of Psychology, University of Cardiff, UK

Objective: To provide a theoretical background, to review existing literature and to present new case material relevant to the treatment of phantom limb pain using hypnotic imagery.

Method: This paper presents two new case reports involving the use of hypnotic imagery procedures in the alleviation of phantom limb pain and reviews 10 previous clinical studies which have involved a similar approach. The earlier studies were identified by electronic and manual searches of the relevant literature.

Results: Two main treatment strategies can be identified: (1) ipsative/ imagery-based approaches and (2) movement/imagery-based approaches. A common finding is the need to treat the phantom limb as a fireal’ body part, to accept its existence as a valid mental representation and to avoid treating the amputation stump as the sole source of the phantom pain sensations.

Conclusion: Hypnotic procedures appear to be a useful adjunct to established strategies for the treatment of phantom limb pain and would repay further, more systematic, investigation. Suggestions are provided as to the factors which should be considered for a more systematic research programme.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 4, 368-377 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr507oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. S. Ramachandran and E. L. Altschuler The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function Brain, July 1, 2009; 132(7): 1693 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, A. Durand, M. Descent, D. Poire, P. Fremont, S. Pelet, J. Gresset, and J. Doyon Effects of Practice, Visual Loss, Limb Amputation, and Disuse on Motor Imagery Vividness Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 449 - 463. [Abstract] [PDF]