This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bialocerkowski, A. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bialocerkowski, A. E Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Difficulties associated with wrist disorders – a qualitative study

School of Physiotherapy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Objective: To explore the range of functional dif"culties and compensatory mechanisms reported by individuals with a wrist disorder, to provide a basis for development of a patient-focused outcome instrument.

Design: Descriptive study using a qualitative, interview-based framework.

Setting/subjects: A volunteer sample of individuals, who were diagnosed with a unilateral, localized wrist disorder, were recruited from a wide range of health care settings situated in different socio-economic and geographic areas of Adelaide, Australia. Recruitment continued until theoretical saturation of the data occurred.

Interventions: Semi-structured, audiotaped interviews were conducted with each individual to elicit information concerning ‘how your wrist disorder has affected your ability to perform daily activities’.

Main outcome measures: Trends regarding reporting of dif"cult activities and compensatory mechanisms used.

Results: Forty-two individuals were interviewed. This was the point where theoretical saturation of research information had been reached. A few individuals reported dif"culty with functional tasks prior to wrist injury. Following diagnosis, a wide range of dif"culties, which included heavy, gross and "ne motor activities, was reported. Compensatory mechanisms were used by all individuals, with requesting someone else to do the task, using the other hand, and using other parts of the body to lift or grasp being the most common.

Conclusions: Current wrist outcome instruments do not contain the full range of dif"cult activities that were elicited from our sample, which casts doubt on these instruments’ ability to fully measure change in capacity. Our results should provide the basis for the development of a relevant, sensitive, patient-focused outcome instrument.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?