This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duncan, P. W Articles by Dudley, T. K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duncan, P. W Articles by Dudley, T. K Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-speci" c outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale

Dean M Reker

Department of Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City and University of Kansas Medical Center, USA

Ronnie D Horner

Epidemiologic Research Information Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, USA

Gregory P Samsa

Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, USA

Helen Hoenig

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC and Duke University Medical Center, USA

Barbara J LaClair

Kansas Health Institute, USA

Tara K Dudley

The Institute for Clinical and Epidemiologic Research Biostatistics Units, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and concurrent validity of a new, mail-administered, stroke-speci"c outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS).

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting and patients: Stroke patients who had lived independently in the community prior to their stroke and who were candidates for post-stroke rehabilitation were recruited from nine, high-volume, Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Centers.

Methods: Two hundred and six patients were mailed the SIS after a sixmonth post-stroke telephone interview. Telephone assessments included the Functional Independence Measure, the Lawton IADL and the SF-36.

Results: The response rate for the mailed SIS was 63%, with 45% of the responses from proxies. The average rate of missing item level scores per patient was 1.3 (range 0–20) resulting in an average rate of 0.13 missing domain scores per patient (range 0–3). Nonresponders to the mailed SIS had more severe strokes with lower functional status at the time of the survey than responders. Proxies were more likely to complete the survey if the subjects were older, married, cognitively impaired and more functionally limited. The SIS did not exhibit a high rate of ‘oor and ceiling effects, particularly in physical function domains, as did the FIM and the SF-36.

Conclusions: The mailed SIS is a feasible means of assessing post-stroke function. Missing items and missing domain scores were extremely low, however, there is a trade-off between the low-cost mail SIS survey on the one hand and the resulting nonresponse bias on the other.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Muus, L. S. Williams, and K. C. Ringsberg Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK) Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 620 - 627. [Abstract] [PDF]